|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
Dear all,
make it sense to use rhoCentralFoam oder rhoCentralDyMFoam for subsonic flows? So maybe for an axial fan were the maximum speed of the fan is 40 m/s so Ma No. < 0.12. Or must I used pressure-based rhoPimpleDyMFoam for such low Mach number flows? Thanks and Regards |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Matvey Kraposhin
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Moscow, Russian Federation
Posts: 355
Rep Power: 20 ![]() |
Hi,
rescently we made hybrid Central/PISO solver which mixes schemes from rhoCentralFoam and rhoPimpleFoam. If you are interested, you can download it here https://github.com/unicfdlab/pisoCentralFoam and test
__________________
MDPI Fluids (Q2) special issue for OSS software: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/fluids/..._modelling_OSS GitHub: https://github.com/unicfdlab Linkedin: https://linkedin.com/in/matvey-kraposhin-413869163 RG: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Matvey_Kraposhin |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
Hey Matevey,
many thanks for you very fast reply! I have download your solver and will test it. Currently I read your paper. My stupid question would be ... can I do something (physically) wrong, if I use rhoCentralFoam or rhoCentralDyMFoam for low Machnumber flows? if yes, can you shortly explain what? Regards |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Matvey Kraposhin
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Moscow, Russian Federation
Posts: 355
Rep Power: 20 ![]() |
Quote:
Also, KT scheme is explicit and it limits timestep with the Acoustic Courant number. So, if your local speed of flow is much smaller then sonic speed, this will lead to very smal time steps Here you can find examples of using hybrid scheme for compressor simulation: https://github.com/unicfdlab/realLifeExamples
__________________
MDPI Fluids (Q2) special issue for OSS software: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/fluids/..._modelling_OSS GitHub: https://github.com/unicfdlab Linkedin: https://linkedin.com/in/matvey-kraposhin-413869163 RG: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Matvey_Kraposhin |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
thank you very much ... I will have a deeper look in your great work... http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...ntralfoam.html
compilation in OpenFOAM 2.3.0 works without any errors ;-) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
twoPhaseEulerFoam drift flows in non-orthogonal mesh and dilute phase | tkeskita | OpenFOAM Bugs | 2 | August 10, 2015 07:30 |
Derivation of the pressure-correction equation for compressible flows | luftraudi | Main CFD Forum | 0 | July 17, 2012 06:35 |
SIMPLE pressure correction in compressible flows | Maarten de Jong | Main CFD Forum | 7 | April 30, 2012 02:23 |
Laminar Solid-Liquid (Two-phase flows) flows in CFX | freemankofi | ANSYS | 0 | April 8, 2010 16:59 |
Free surface flows and multiphase flows | Vidar | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 18, 2008 05:05 |