CFD Online Discussion Forums

CFD Online Discussion Forums (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam-solving/)
-   -   Combustion models defined without a transport package (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam-solving/164613-combustion-models-defined-without-transport-package.html)

t.oliveira December 27, 2015 21:31

Combustion models defined without a transport package
 
Some combustion models (diffusion, FSD, infinitelyFastChemistry) require the definition of a transport package (constTransport, sutherlandTransport) while others (noCombustion, laminar, PaSR) don't.

Why is it like that? In which aspect the second group of combustion models differs from the first one, so to not need the definition of a transport package?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:13.