CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

k-kl-omega Turbulence Model doubt:

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 9, 2016, 17:30
Default k-kl-omega Turbulence Model doubt:
Senior Member
shereez234's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: England
Posts: 273
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 7
shereez234 is on a distinguished road
Hey guys. I am doing a low reynolds number airfoil analysis using kkl- Omega model and I expect a laminar bubble near leading edge. Can some one suggest to me whether for this model the Yplus needs to be 1 or below or between 30 to 100?

shereez234 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 10, 2016, 09:05
Senior Member
shereez234's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: England
Posts: 273
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 7
shereez234 is on a distinguished road
Is there any one who can give me some help on this? Thanks in advance guys
shereez234 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 13, 2016, 09:29
Senior Member
Artur's Avatar
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Southampton, UK
Posts: 307
Rep Power: 12
Artur will become famous soon enough

In order to use a transition model you need to get to y+ < 1.0, actually I'd suggest more like <0.5 while keeping less than 0.25 over most of your cells if you can only afford it. I suggest having a look here for very good guidance on how to set the model up in OpenFOAM:

All the best

Artur is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 17, 2016, 14:41
Default New model
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 6
malv83 is on a distinguished road
After 8 years, there is a new version (or new model) of the k-kl-omega model.

There are a few problems with the k-kl-omega model in the farfield. One of them is the growth of Laminar Kinetic energy when separation occurs. Lopez and Walters have a paper (have not been published yet) correcting this issue:

Maurin Lopez. D. K. Walters. “A recommended correction to the k-kl-omega transition sensitive eddy-viscosity model”. Journal of Fluid Engineering.

This correction has to be made to the 2008 k-kl-omega model from now on.

Now, Lopez and Walters also developed a new transitional model (k-omega-v2) as an alternative to the k-kl-omega one. This new model has more capabilities (it is more reliable) than the k-kl-omega model, especially in the farfield computations. Fortunately the paper for this new model is already publish.

Maurin Lopez. D. K. Walters. “Prediction of transitional and fully turbulent free shear flows using an alternative to the laminar kinetic energy approach”. Journal of Turbulence, Vol 17, Iss. 3, 2016.

If you see the papers, you will immediately see how the k-kl-omega model is not good for free shear flows, and how the new model corrects all those issues. From now on, k-kl-omega users have to start using the new k-omega-v2 model.
malv83 is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Use of k-epsilon and k-omega Models Jade M Main CFD Forum 30 February 17, 2018 12:53
New Phase Compressible Turbulence Model for multiphase system vishal3 OpenFOAM Programming & Development 0 November 24, 2015 01:17
Implement an les turbulence model pante OpenFOAM Programming & Development 19 December 5, 2014 17:16
How to decide to Turbulence model shipman OpenFOAM 2 August 18, 2013 03:00
Transition kappa omega turbulence model mannobot FLUENT 0 June 9, 2010 04:11

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:29.