|
[Sponsors] | |||||
unexpected result during verification of SandiD_LTS using EDC |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
nicky chaigneau
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
Hello
I´m trying to make the validation for the sandi D Flame using EDC - reactingFoam. But my result are not very good. I have disabled the radiation properties then I change the meshing to have a more bigger computing space. like written in the Allrun file the simulation first make 1500 iteration without chemical then 10 000 iteration with kEpsilon turbulence modelling. Next I add 5 000 other iterations using realizableKE and my result seems unlogic. I have two picture representing the contour plot of temperature and the axial plot of temperature with kEpsilon and realizableKE. I think the result of kEpsilon is coherent but the one with reakizableKE seems to be quit bad. the gradient of temperature is very high after the maximum of temperature and I think it is not correct. But I cannot find the problem. can you help me please ? |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ANSYS Workbench on "Uncertified" Linux Distros | hsr | CFX | 289 | April 20, 2023 10:23 |
| FLUENT installation on UBUNTU 12.04 (LTS) | teymourj | FLUENT | 2 | March 1, 2017 23:24 |
| Confused with Laminar Finite-rate model and EDC model | tjushang | FLUENT | 2 | April 25, 2015 18:04 |
| unexpected result => fluid is going out ! | cramsdead | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | November 26, 2014 09:13 |
| turbineSiting tutorial: slip condition at top boundary gives unexpected result | letzel | OpenFOAM | 0 | June 6, 2014 06:25 |