|
[Sponsors] |
can't get y+ even near 30, which turbulence model to choose? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 14, 2018, 18:15 |
can't get y+ even near 30, which turbulence model to choose?
|
#1 |
New Member
Jan Beske
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 8 |
Hello dear fellow Foamers,
I am at a loss. I am working on a centrifugal pump case and due to very low volume flow values I have very small dimensions for my pump. It is a closed channel pump, rotating at 6000rpm with an inlet of 4mm in height (outside diameter - inside diameter) and at the outer radius it is only 1.5mm high. This leads to very low Reynolds Numbers across the channel, between 1e5 and 1.5e5 . If I try to get my y+ over 30 I get very little cells across my outlet profile. With y+=100 there would be only 3 cells, which is way to little to use a regular k-epsilon-model, am I right? Now Openfoam has several turbulence models available, such as the k-omega, k-omegaSST and whatnot. I have no trouble getting my y+ below 1, but I am confused about the different models. Does anybody have experience with low Reynolds-Numbers? What would be an appropriate turbulence model to use? I'd be very grateful for any tips or help |
|
January 15, 2018, 00:06 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Uwe Pilz
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Posts: 744
Rep Power: 15 |
If you use Large Eddy Simulation you make a mesh as fine as you want. The finer the mesh the smaller the eddies resolved by the simulation. If the get very fine you come in the near of DNS (which might be possible in you small geometry).
__________________
Uwe Pilz -- Die der Hauptbewegung überlagerte Schwankungsbewegung ist in ihren Einzelheiten so hoffnungslos kompliziert, daß ihre theoretische Berechnung aussichtslos erscheint. (Hermann Schlichting, 1950) |
|
January 15, 2018, 05:05 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Jan Beske
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 8 |
Thanks for your fast response!
According to the script of my numerical simulations course, A Reynolds number of around 12 000 still needs about 2000 grid cells across my canal profile. It also needs a siginificant amount of timesteps to calculate, and I don't really have many resources at my hand, computer-wise. So I doubt, even if it works with DNS, that I could calculate the simulation in a reasonable fashion :/ Do you maybe know of any turbulence models that make use of a better wall function or no wall function at all? Because of the small dimensions I have in my model, I think it consists mainly of boundary layer region :/ |
|
January 15, 2018, 06:37 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Uwe Pilz
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Posts: 744
Rep Power: 15 |
LES and RANS work different concerning wall functions.
In RANS there is no way to cover turbulence in a direct way. All ha to be modeled. Therefore you need your wall distance, because the models require it and work in a wrong way with larger or smaller yPlus. LES simulates the turbulence in large eddies in a direct way. It is allowed here to use small element sizes and a small yPlus. The amount of turbulence which has to be modeled with wall functions gets smaller than. All in all the turbulence is covered. Part of it by wall functions and part of it by the direct simulation. ~ You may try LES/dynamicEqn. It uses wall functions of course, but you don't have to set any coefficients.
__________________
Uwe Pilz -- Die der Hauptbewegung überlagerte Schwankungsbewegung ist in ihren Einzelheiten so hoffnungslos kompliziert, daß ihre theoretische Berechnung aussichtslos erscheint. (Hermann Schlichting, 1950) Last edited by piu58; January 15, 2018 at 07:58. |
|
January 15, 2018, 08:06 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Jan Beske
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 8 |
Thanks I will try that.
That only leaves the problem of validation. Do you know where I could ask for or find comparable cases, to validate my results? Of course, my case is rather special, so there probably won't be something equal, but I'd take anything that goes in the right direction at the moment. |
|
January 15, 2018, 12:14 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Uwe Pilz
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Posts: 744
Rep Power: 15 |
If you don't have any experience with simulations I recommend well studied geometries like channel flow or flow past a sphere. You may choose a very small geometry for that to study the wall functions.
__________________
Uwe Pilz -- Die der Hauptbewegung überlagerte Schwankungsbewegung ist in ihren Einzelheiten so hoffnungslos kompliziert, daß ihre theoretische Berechnung aussichtslos erscheint. (Hermann Schlichting, 1950) |
|
January 15, 2018, 12:19 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Jan Beske
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 8 |
Okay I will do that.
Thanks again for taking the time to help me |
|
Tags |
centrifugal pump, low reynolds number, turbulence models, wall boundary conditions |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Use of k-epsilon and k-omega Models | Jade M | Main CFD Forum | 40 | January 27, 2023 07:18 |
Turbulence model for two phase incompressible flow | SailorLiu | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | April 4, 2016 07:53 |
Only two turbulence options available in CFX Pre | Jack001 | CFX | 5 | March 30, 2016 02:47 |
What model of turbulence choose to study an external aerodynamics case | raffale | OpenFOAM | 0 | August 23, 2012 05:45 |
question about turbulence model selection and sensitivity | karananand | Main CFD Forum | 1 | February 26, 2010 04:41 |