CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Waterfall-dissipation well simulation

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By Tobi
  • 1 Post By Santiago

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 10, 2018, 11:21
Default Waterfall-dissipation well simulation
  #1
New Member
 
Jose Diaz
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Medellín, Colombia.
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
kinneas is on a distinguished road
Dear forum,

We are currently testing a simulation that involves a multiphase flow (Water and air), basically is a rectangular channel that ultimately leads to a dissipation well:






The current setup, which uses InterDyMFoam as solver is limited to a CFL number of 1, is able to somewhat represent the expected behavior of the flow with a peak velocity of ~50 m/s in the main channel, unfortunately in the waterfall zone that has an elevation delta of ~200m (where the fluid separates from the channel and falls to the dissipation well), the dynamic mesh chases small particles of water that are quite spread from the main flow, increasing cells count and hence computation time significantly because the time step to model this behavior, unnecessary for our goals, and maintain the desired CFL number is sitting at 7e-4 s (which is a no-go).
We have already tried limiting the maximum cell count for the dynamic mesh with no success.

I was wondering, is InterDyMFoam a good choice for this type of simulation or is there another way (solver, procedure…) to tackle this model? We would greatly appreciate any suggestion.

Kind regards,

José D.
kinneas is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 15, 2018, 07:26
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 292
Rep Power: 13
BlnPhoenix is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by kinneas View Post
Dear forum,

We are currently testing a simulation that involves a multiphase flow (Water and air), basically is a rectangular channel that ultimately leads to a dissipation well:






The current setup, which uses InterDyMFoam as solver is limited to a CFL number of 1, is able to somewhat represent the expected behavior of the flow with a peak velocity of ~50 m/s in the main channel, unfortunately in the waterfall zone that has an elevation delta of ~200m (where the fluid separates from the channel and falls to the dissipation well), the dynamic mesh chases small particles of water that are quite spread from the main flow, increasing cells count and hence computation time significantly because the time step to model this behavior, unnecessary for our goals, and maintain the desired CFL number is sitting at 7e-4 s (which is a no-go).
We have already tried limiting the maximum cell count for the dynamic mesh with no success.

I was wondering, is InterDyMFoam a good choice for this type of simulation or is there another way (solver, procedure…) to tackle this model? We would greatly appreciate any suggestion.

Kind regards,

José D.

In the DynamicMeshDict you can also limit the number of refinement steps.
Alternatively you can mesh your model uniformly but in my mind it usually is better to use Dynamic mesh sizing like in InterDyMFoam.
BlnPhoenix is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 26, 2018, 07:47
Default
  #3
Super Moderator
 
Tobi's Avatar
 
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Tussenhausen
Posts: 2,708
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 51
Tobi has a spectacular aura aboutTobi has a spectacular aura aboutTobi has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via ICQ to Tobi Send a message via Skype™ to Tobi
Quote:
CFL number is sitting at 7e-4 s
is in my opinion acceptable and it depend on how much you are going to refine the mesh. I would use the suggestion of BinPhoenix and limit the maximum amount of cells or limit your refinement level e.g. to 2.
Hope that Medellin is nice to be. I am going to that place soon
Santiago likes this.
__________________
Keep foaming,
Tobias Holzmann
Tobi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 27, 2018, 04:04
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Santiago Lopez Castano
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 354
Rep Power: 15
Santiago is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tobi View Post
is in my opinion acceptable and it depend on how much you are going to refine the mesh. I would use the suggestion of BinPhoenix and limit the maximum amount of cells or limit your refinement level e.g. to 2.
Hope that Medellin is nice to be. I am going to that place soon
Nice! If youre open to see different things from Europe, I think you might like the city. Some places to visit: Arvi park (is a peripheral natural reserve enclosing the city), "El castillo" museum (a castle, not like Neuschwanstein, but one of the few in S. America), plaza Botero and Antioquia Museum (have you heard of Fernando Botero, the painter? Hes from medellin, youll find there a lot of his sculptures and paintings), Lleras Park (to do apperitiv), and if you like "adventure" you can do the graffiTour. Basically they take you around the city's Ghettos, many of which are painted with Graffitis telling stories about the particular "barrio".

Then, if you have the time, you should go to Rionegro and Guatape. These are two villages close to Medellin. You will not regret.

Foods to eat: pandeyuca and pandebono (like a Brioche, but not quite). Bunuelos (very similar to the german quarkballchen or italian frittelle, but again not quite). If you are up to eating A LOT, you may try the "bandeja paisa" (similar to the Irish Breakfast).

Thats it. Have fun.
Tobi likes this.
Santiago is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 27, 2018, 14:14
Default
  #5
Super Moderator
 
Tobi's Avatar
 
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Tussenhausen
Posts: 2,708
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 51
Tobi has a spectacular aura aboutTobi has a spectacular aura aboutTobi has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via ICQ to Tobi Send a message via Skype™ to Tobi
Thanks for replying to the Medellin stuff. Sounds great - I should invite you on a beer. However, to kinneas, there could be another option too. You could use my extended library in order to refine the interface higher while keeping the internal droplet coarse. That just came into my mind. My extended library is hosted on my server https://holzmann-cfd.de
__________________
Keep foaming,
Tobias Holzmann
Tobi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 29, 2018, 09:38
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Jose Diaz
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Medellín, Colombia.
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
kinneas is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tobi View Post
Thanks for replying to the Medellin stuff. Sounds great - I should invite you on a beer. However, to kinneas, there could be another option too. You could use my extended library in order to refine the interface higher while keeping the internal droplet coarse. That just came into my mind. My extended library is hosted on my server https://holzmann-cfd.de
Dear Tobi and Santiago,

Thank you for responses. Currently we switched to a standard mesh with a different refinement taking into account our previous results, things look a little bit more promising than using a dynamic mesh, fortunately we still have some resources left to tune and play a little bit more with this case.

We'll take a deep look at the resources hosted in your web page!

Kind regards,

José Díaz.
kinneas is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Some questions about flow boiling simulation in Fluent beastieboys6 FLUENT 8 November 20, 2017 23:47
Surface Source - Fixed Temperature? robtheslob FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM 18 May 12, 2017 02:28
Simulation FPEs - turbulence for transient and steady-state? DaveR OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 5 March 5, 2017 15:06
Dissipation rate access K. Kevala FLUENT 0 July 14, 2004 11:11
TKE SPECTRUM & DISSIPATION Christian Paukert Main CFD Forum 2 March 14, 2001 19:34


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:38.