|
[Sponsors] | |||||
actual flow rate not match the designed flow rate in ventilation modeling |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Pu Gong
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: London
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Hi foamers
I am doing a displacement ventilation modeling of a single office with a seated occupants which generating heat thermal plume using buoyantBoussinesqPimpleFoam. The inlet and outlet size are both 0.2×0.2=0.04m2, the inlet velocity is 0.25m/s, hence as my expect the volume flow rate of inlet (designed flow rate) and outlet should be 0.01m3/s, or 10L/s. However, the actual volume flow rate result from flow rate monitor is 9L/s. Anyone please help how can I make the actual flow rate the same as designed value? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Peter Baskovich
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 127
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
Are you using fluxCorrected boundary conditions?
Please post more info, whole case is good in a zip or post the 0 folder and boundary files to start with. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
New Member
Pu Gong
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: London
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Quote:
Thanks for your reply. Please check my U, T and P-rgh files. And what you mean by the fluxCorrected boundary condition? Is it a inlet outlet boundary condition that can be identified in the U file? Cheers Code:
FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class volVectorField;
object U;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //
dimensions [0 1 -1 0 0 0 0];
internalField uniform (0 0 0);
boundaryField
{
inlet
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform (0.25 0 0);
}
outlet
{
type inletOutlet;
inletValue uniform (0 0 0);
value uniform (0 0 0);
}
top
{
type noSlip;
}
bottom
{
type noSlip;
}
wall
{
type noSlip;
}
desk
{
type noSlip;
}
human
{
type noSlip;
}
}
// ************************************************************************* //
Code:
FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class volScalarField;
object T;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //
dimensions [0 0 0 1 0 0 0];
internalField uniform 298.15;
boundaryField
{
inlet
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 298.15;
}
outlet
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 298.15;
}
top
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 298.15;
}
bottom
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 298.15;
}
wall
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 298.15;
}
desk
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 298.15;
}
human
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 298.15;
}
}
Code:
FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class volScalarField;
object p_rgh;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //
dimensions [0 2 -2 0 0 0 0];
internalField uniform 0;
boundaryField
{
inlet
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 0;
}
outlet
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 0;
}
top
{
type fixedFluxPressure;
rho rhok;
value uniform 0;
}
bottom
{
type fixedFluxPressure;
rho rhok;
value uniform 0;
}
wall
{
type fixedFluxPressure;
rho rhok;
value uniform 0;
}
desk
{
type fixedFluxPressure;
rho rhok;
value uniform 0;
}
human
{
type fixedFluxPressure;
rho rhok;
value uniform 0;
}
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Flow rate restriction simulation set-up | siw | CFX | 4 | February 16, 2016 13:15 |
| CFD Modeling of Two-phase Flow in Small Dia.Tubes | Eric Poindexter | Main CFD Forum | 2 | September 22, 2000 10:21 |
| fluid flow fundas | ram | Main CFD Forum | 5 | June 17, 2000 22:31 |
| Hydrostatic pressure in 2-phase flow modeling (CFX4.2) | HB &DS | CFX | 0 | January 9, 2000 14:19 |
| Hydrostatic pressure in 2-phase flow modeling (long) | DS & HB | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 8, 2000 16:00 |