|
[Sponsors] |
March 8, 2020, 14:34 |
Using GGI / AMI for static simulation
|
#1 |
New Member
Mattia
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Novara - Italy
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 8 |
Hello,
I'm struggling with a stiff case and I would like to understand better if GGI / AMI approach may be suitable. I have an internal flow case to be run, but the inlet component has to be tested in different shapes. The mesh is static, no adaptive refinements and no movements what so ever; the only issue is the components complexity and their meshing time. Doing multiple meshes is my last choice as the background mesh is a bit complicated and can't be defeatured; also I would prefere not to work with my standard mesher only (structured multiblock one, pretty complex) at least for the background mesh as it's pretty irregular. Now, the inlet component has four variants but its bounding box is always the same; therefore I was wondering if is possible to use GGI or AMI (I can run both extend-41 and 1812 variants on our cluster) in order to have some sort of "plugin system", some kind of a overset-ish method... Is this something that may work? Is GGI a technique for moving-meshes only? Does GGI requires dynamic-mesh-aware solvers even if the simulation is static and won't involve any moving part? I didn't see any reference about ggi in DyM nor standard solvers code, that's why I'm asking. Thanks for any advice |
|
Tags |
ami, ggi, non-conformal mesh |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unable to sample completed AMI simulation. | Alhasan | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 1 | May 24, 2017 06:14 |
MRFSimpleFoam + AMI in 2.1.0 vs GGI in 1.5-dev | marcelgt87 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 12 | July 15, 2014 11:57 |
AMI simulation unstable within first few timesteps | craig0a | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | February 24, 2014 13:09 |
Frozen Rotor 1:1 Mesh Connection | pharley | CFX | 5 | January 31, 2013 17:15 |
Ggi Question | JulytoNovember | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | March 19, 2012 13:09 |