|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Diego Jerez
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 7 ![]() |
Hi to all,
I found that MULES method can be used as a semi implicit method, but I really dont understand very well how this works. On the page where this method is presented says: "It first executes an implicit predictor step, based on purely bounded numerical operators, e.g. Euler implicit in time, upwind for convection, etc., before constructing an explicit correction on which the MULES limiter is applied. This approach maintains boundedness and stability at an arbitrarily large Courant number." So, firts calculate the cell with implicit method and then use an explicit correction with courant number? how is that, choose other delta t? Sorry if a asking questions with no sense, im a begginer in OpenFOAM. Greetings! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
qutadah
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: USA
Posts: 101
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
I see no one has answered your question, I have another question, since it says semi-implicit is introduced i think in version 2.14, and now its version 9, which method is the standard MULES, semi-implicit or explicit?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 353
Rep Power: 21 ![]() |
Code:
"alpha.liquid.*" { cAlpha 0; nAlphaCorr 2; nAlphaSubCycles 2; MULESCorr yes; nLimiterIter 1; solver smoothSolver; smoother symGaussSeidel; tolerance 1e-8; relTol 0; } The semi-implicit version of MULES can be switched on through the MULESCorr switch. Hasn't changed since it's release in 2.3.0 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
qutadah
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: USA
Posts: 101
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
thank you, how do I know if my MULES algorithm is operating in the PIMPLE or PISO mode? Did I understand this correctly? It uses the subcycling but each individual subcycle operates normally as a PIMPLE/PISO algorithm?
Can I force it to work in one mode or another ? Or does it fully depend on what values i used for the nOuterCorrectors? Thanks! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
implicit enthalpy method for phase change | libya81 | System Analysis | 0 | April 7, 2015 23:28 |
On the alpha Eqn of VOF method when using Immersed boundary method in OpenFOAM | keepfit | OpenFOAM | 4 | January 31, 2014 14:32 |
Implicit method for Navier Stokes equations | Vasiliy | Main CFD Forum | 9 | December 3, 2012 13:07 |
Alpha higher than 1 and mules implicit. | Alexpzz | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 2, 2012 22:20 |
Implicit method of FSI | cjtune | Siemens | 0 | March 12, 2003 12:07 |