CFD Online Discussion Forums

CFD Online Discussion Forums (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam-solving/)
-   -   Uncertain k values with multiphaseStabilizedTurbulence (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam-solving/226427-uncertain-k-values-multiphasestabilizedturbulence.html)

GrivalszkiP April 27, 2020 10:21

Uncertain k values with multiphaseStabilizedTurbulence
 
2 Attachment(s)
Hi!

I have uncertain k values from my multiphase simulations.
I used the new multiphaseStabilizedTurbulence fvOption to get correct k everywhere. Unfortunatelly, I did not get the k values I expected. On my graphs, one can see average k in specified verticals. The green line shows the result I expect, but If I refine my mesh, the k values are not better, but worse. Why is it? Do I have to use different BCs, or is there a mistake in the fvOptions?
I have a RAS with k-omega SST turbulence closure, and I use kqRWallFunction on the walls. For free surface capturing, I use isoAdvector (interIsoFoam).

Thank you in advance!

Code:

/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\
| =========                |                                                |
| \\      /  F ield        | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox          |
|  \\    /  O peration    | Version:  v1812                                |
|  \\  /    A nd          | Web:      www.OpenFOAM.com                      |
|    \\/    M anipulation  |                                                |
\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
FoamFile
{
    version    2.0;
    format      ascii;
    class      dictionary;
    location    "constant";
    object      fvOptions;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //

    multiphaseStabilizedTurbulence1
    {
        type            multiphaseStabilizedTurbulence;
        active          yes;

        multiphaseStabilizedTurbulenceCoeffs
        {
            // Optional coefficients
            lambda2        0.1;  // A value of 0 sets the nut correction to 0
            Cmu            0.09;  // from k-epsilon model
            C              1.51;  // from k-omega model
            alpha          1.36;  // 1/Prt
        }
    }


// ************************************************************************* //


djdudns August 21, 2022 23:58

Hi what CFD problem it is?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:00.