CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Heat flux is not conserved across the boundaries

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By geth03

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 16, 2020, 05:44
Default Heat flux is not conserved across the boundaries
  #1
New Member
 
CFDUSER
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Germany
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 5
tbhanderi is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I am new to OpenFOAM. I am trying to solve 2D steady state heat conduction problem as per case setup in URL link.

I have postprocessed the results in Paraview, got the correct temperature profile "but heat flux is not conserved between both the boundaries."

Anyone has an idea what could be the issue?

However in Ansys heat flux is conserved with the same mesh and boundary conditions.


Note :
Solver-laplacianFoam.
To calculate heat flux at the boundaries in Paraview , I am using extract block and integrate variable options.



casefile download link : https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Bf...BDSFMrtYEyPR07
tbhanderi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 26, 2020, 05:06
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Cologne, Germany
Posts: 355
Rep Power: 8
geth03 is on a distinguished road
hi,
i did face a similar problem, and i believe that the calculations with openfoam are correct but paraview postprocessing misses the point somewhat.

i have a pipe with two fluids, i compare the integrated velocities, which are the volume fluxes, and strangely i don't get the same values at the inlet and outlet of the pipe with paraview for those two fluids. when i postprocess w/ openfoam functions with correct weighting i get the correct results and mass is conserved.

i think paraview's integrated variables doesn't use correct weighting and creates wrong answers.
geth03 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 26, 2020, 05:26
Default
  #3
New Member
 
CFDUSER
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Germany
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 5
tbhanderi is on a distinguished road
Hi,

Thank for the reply.

I will try with OpenFOAM postprocessing functions. I also believe that the issue is with paraview integrating functions because i got all the other results correct.

As far as your case is concern (Pipe flow with two fluids), Paraview calculates correct fluxes as I have checked flux conservation in some pipe flow cases. Could you provide your case just to check flux conservation in paraview ?
tbhanderi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 27, 2020, 01:55
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Cologne, Germany
Posts: 355
Rep Power: 8
geth03 is on a distinguished road
in my case i'm using a multiphase solver, so there is the void fraction involved.
when i integrate the velocity, normally i should get the flux, but the void fraction weighting is not considered, so just by comparing those integrated velocities i don't get the correct volume flux. paraview doesn't take this into account.
tbhanderi likes this.
geth03 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Total heat transf. rate vs Total surface heat flux Renato Sousa FLUENT 1 April 14, 2020 03:27
Radiation in semi-transparent media with surface-to-surface model? mpeppels CFX 11 August 22, 2019 07:30
Conjugate Heat Transfer: Wall Heat Flux at Coupled Walls? MaxHeat FLUENT 4 September 14, 2017 10:44
Udf for moving heat flux in 2D cylindrical geometry devia21 Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 0 April 20, 2015 00:27
Heat Flux Profile at Fluid-Porous Interface Hitch8 CFX 4 December 15, 2012 09:57


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:08.