| worldsheep |
October 1, 2021 11:32 |
Simulation avec interface AMI, maillage SALOME
Hello everyone,
I am simulating a rotor-stator system using different methods starting from the examples provided in openfoam (ex. mixerVesselAMI2D).
Every time I use an AMI interface I get the following warings:
Code:
FOAM Warning : From virtual void Foam::faceAreaWeightAMI::calcInterArea(Foam::label, Foam::label, Foam::scalar&, Foam::vector&) const
in file AMIInterpolation/AMIInterpolation/faceAreaWeightAMI/faceAreaWeightAMI.C at line 414
Invalid normal for source face 0 points 3((0.00193882 0.0019985 -0.00016) (0.00188455 0.00193079 -0.00016) (0.00185038 0.00199937 -0.00016)) target face
41675 points 3((-0.00230661 0.00266591 0.00065) (-0.00225043 0.00274269 0.00065) (-0.00222007 0.00264246 0.00065))
This is independent of the solver. I get the same error for:
- Stationary MRF simulations using AMI solved with simpleFoam
- Transient sumulations using AMI solved with pimpleFoam
My mesh is generated using Salome. I mesh the rotor region and the stator region separately with netgen. To make it conformal at time zero, I import the 1D-2D elements from the rotor to mesh the stator and then make a compound with the options below:
- Processing identical groups -> Unite
- Create groups from input objects -> unchecked
- Merge coincident nodes and elements -> unckeked
The mesh is then exported using: https://github.com/nicolasedh/salomeToOpenFOAM
In the boundary file:
Code:
AMI_in
{
type cyclicAMI;
inGroups 1(cyclicAMI);
nFaces 41676;
startFace 4200354;
matchTolerance 0.0001;
transform noOrdering;
neighbourPatch AMI_out;
AMIMethod faceAreaWeightAMI;
restartUncoveredSourceFace 1;
}
AMI_out
{
type cyclicAMI;
inGroups 1(cyclicAMI);
nFaces 41676;
startFace 4459504;
matchTolerance 0.0001;
transform noOrdering;
neighbourPatch AMI_in;
AMIMethod faceAreaWeightAMI;
restartUncoveredSourceFace 1;
}
In my velocity boundary conditions:
Code:
AMI_in
{
type cyclicAMI;
value uniform (0 0 0);
}
AMI_out
{
type cyclicAMI;
value uniform (0 0 0);
}
In my pressure boundary condition:
Code:
AMI_in
{
type cyclicAMI;
value uniform 0;
}
AMI_out
{
type cyclicAMI;
value uniform 0;
}
Has anyone an idea why is this warining generated? |
