|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Background
So, I recieved a bunch of OF simulations from a colleague. They are 2D turbulent RANS komegaSST airfoil simulations. They are solved with simpleFoam, despite having an oscillating solution due to boundary layer separation vortexes. As far as I understand, if you throw RANS at an airfoil, the unsteady turbulent eddy bits are averaged out, and we compensate that by making viscosity higher. So the solution over time becomes suddenly steady, and simpleFoam works, if you don't have more unsteady phenomena. But the boundary layer separation vortexes are unsteady, so I'm not sure if the simulation is valid. I have attached an image of the force coefficients on the simulated airfoil per iteration. There you can see that if we put the airfoil at 0º, the solution is steady. However if we place the airfoil vertically at 90º, the solution becomes unsteady, because of flow separation. Question: my colleage gave me simulations with oscillating solutions (view attachment, 90º plot), solved with simpleFoam. Since openFoam is a steady solver, is the solution valid?. "Attachment": https://imgur.com/JJ7gGhB. (filesize too big to attach)https://imgur.com/JJ7gGhBhttps://imgur.com/JJ7gGhB Last edited by ghastbug; November 23, 2021 at 08:22. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Transient simulation gives worse results than steady state simulation | jgross | CFX | 12 | January 21, 2021 12:21 |
icoUncoupledKinematicParcelFoam - simpleFoam pisoFoam | saidc. | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | March 29, 2020 14:27 |
Input File for transient cavitating flow | Badi | CFX | 13 | July 1, 2013 09:28 |
Transient flow in fluent | linyx | FLUENT | 15 | April 24, 2013 09:54 |
transient simulation of a rotating rectangle | icesniffer | CFX | 1 | August 8, 2009 07:25 |