CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Residuals of overset mesh simulation

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 26, 2022, 07:16
Question Residuals of overset mesh simulation
New Member
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
dcyclo is on a distinguished road
Dear Foamers,

Recently I was testing the overset mesh capabilities of OpenFoam-v2006 for a 2D vertical axis wind turbine case. My mesh consisted of: farfield mesh (level 0), refined mesh around the blades (level 1) and blade mesh (level 2).

I understood from technical description that in OpenFoam the background meshes are solved until the walls. Indeed, my “level 0” and “level 1” meshes were solved until the blades. Generally, I have found this a bit mean, but I also read that the solutions are corrected on the interfaces by interpolation (the well-known 4 cell-wise interpolation).

During the post-processing I have followed the suggested methods, starting from 33 mins of the following video:

After using the tricks of slice, threshold, and translation of the meshes in the 3rd direction, I ended up a classical overset mesh solution with smooth interfaces between the mesh regions. Aerodynamic forces were also calculated correctly, using the obtained data from blade mesh (level 2).

Even though, the above written process is now straightforward for me and delivers the expected behavior from overset meshing, I have a huge concern regarding the residuals. In the residual monitoring, the residuals of all cells are listed. Obviously, the residuals of the level 0 but even level 1 meshes next to the blades are huge. As mentioned before, during the post-processing it became evident that these cells with the big residuals will be neglected from the final results. However, the simulation controls are based on residuals. I like letting the solver to use more nOuterCorrectors in the PIMPLE scheme if needed. During my sliding mesh cases, in general around 30 nOuterCorrectors iterations were needed for the PIMPLE scheme. Due to the residuals of level 0 and level 1 meshes however, in my overset calculations (no matter how many nOuterCorrectors I let the software to do) I never reach the prescribed convergence. It is also worth to mention that in example cases I saw a small number (1 or 2) for the nOuterCorrectors and I have not found any literature / video where people did discuss the convergence of overset mesh simulations.

After this thorough description I have the following question: does anybody know a trick to switch off the residual calculation for the background meshes? If you have any other solutions, I do also appreciate to hear them.

dcyclo is offline   Reply With Quote


convergence, overset mesh, residual, residualcontrol

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[overset] Overset mesh leaving background mesh domain mcaus OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 September 9, 2021 08:59
help with setting up overset mesh calv FLUENT 0 May 14, 2017 10:12
Help in setting up an overset mesh RKE STAR-CCM+ 1 February 21, 2014 22:35
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file SSL FLUENT 2 January 26, 2008 12:55
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? Joe CFX 2 March 26, 2007 19:10

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:18.