CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Enabling LTS (for lagrangian solvers)

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 13, 2022, 11:52
Default Enabling LTS (for lagrangian solvers)
  #1
New Member
 
Lennart
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 3
levoCFD is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I am wondering which measures are generally required to switch from fixed time steps to local time stepping in OpenFOAM. I was expecting this to be a common problem but I could not find any helpful information on it online.

I am currently working with the lagrangian solver simpleReactingParcelFoam and I would like to use local time stepping to reduce the simulation run time as far as possible.

Therefore, I have compared the tutorial cases verticalChannel and verticalChannelLTS in the tutorial directory lagrangian/reactingParcelFoam. I have noticed several differences in the controlDict, fvSchemes and fvSolutions files. One difference is the specification of a maximum Courant number (maxCo) in the fvSolutions.

However, when I run the case verticalChannelLTS with different values for maxCo, it does not influence the run time. I was expecting that for small Courant numbers, the time steps would be decreased resulting in a longer run time.
The same thing applies to the maximum time step maxDeltaT.

Do you know why this is the case?

Best regards
levoCFD is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
lagrangian, local time stepping, lts


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
So it's all just Taylor Expansion, Runge Kutta integration and Gauss-Seidel solvers? aerosayan Main CFD Forum 10 October 24, 2021 07:42
Should I focus on explicit or implicit solvers for transient simulations? aerosayan Main CFD Forum 1 April 11, 2021 07:31
Solid Mechanics Solvers added to OpenFOAM Extend bigphil OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources 26 October 12, 2017 04:01
FSI solvers - best solvers steven123 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 July 8, 2014 10:26
Openfoam Ubuntu 12.04 Unmet dependencies slls33 OpenFOAM Installation 10 April 9, 2013 04:16


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:53.