# YPlus for SpalartAllmaras

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 November 24, 2008, 17:22 Hi all, I am running MRFSimpl #1 New Member   Dnyanesh Digraskar Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Amherst, MA, United States Posts: 10 Rep Power: 10 Sponsored Links Hi all, I am running MRFSimpleFoam with SpalartAllmaras turbulence model. I want to calculate YPlus for walls. When I use checkYPlus utility, it returns me 0 values for yP. Sample o/p of YPlus: Selecting incompressible transport model Newtonian Selecting turbulence model SpalartAllmaras Patch 0 named wing y+ : min: 0 max: 0 average: 0 Patch 1 named cylinder_wall y+ : min: 0 max: 0 average: 0 Time = 0.112876 Reading field p Reading field U Reading/calculating face flux field phi Selecting incompressible transport model Newtonian Selecting turbulence model SpalartAllmaras Patch 0 named wing y+ : min: 0 max: 0 average: 0 Patch 1 named cylinder_wall y+ : min: 0 max: 0 average: 0 Time = 0.113321 Reading field p Reading field U Can anyone help me. I think selecting the SpallartAlmaras model, sets something in YPlus equation to 0, but im not sure about what. Thanks alot for help.

 December 12, 2008, 15:29 Dnyanesh, First and foremos #2 New Member   Nate See Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 1 Rep Power: 0 Dnyanesh, First and foremost let it be known that I am not a current user of OpenFOAM. I actually just found out about it today and am currently cruising the message board to try and get a feel for the product. Therefore, I do not know how the incompressible transport model or SA turbulence model has been implemented. However, I will impart my knowledge of the SA turbulence model. The SA turbulence model solves a transport equation for the eddy viscosity. However, to insure that the Dirichlet boundary condition is satisfied at the wall, it will set the eddy viscosity equal to zero. The part that I am not 100% sure of, and hopefully someone else can chime in, is how the eddy viscosity relates to the kinematic viscosity (what y+ is based off of). What I would suggest is taking the value one cell off of the surface (as long as it is relatively close to the surface, e.g. the first layer of the boundary layer grid) and use that value. This is what NASA's Fun3D, full Navier-Stokes solver, does to display the y+ on the surfaces. Hope this helps, Nate

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post nedved OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 November 30, 2014 23:43 seb62 OpenFOAM Bugs 39 May 30, 2012 14:25 egp OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 45 October 28, 2010 03:30 ivan_cozza OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 December 15, 2008 07:34 lillberg OpenFOAM Bugs 4 December 7, 2007 09:17