CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Little question concerning pressure dimension

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 28, 2008, 11:15
Default Hi folks, I was wondering a
  #1
Member
 
Leonardo Nettis
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 72
Rep Power: 17
dinonettis is on a distinguished road
Hi folks,

I was wondering about the pressure dimension adopted in different solver I'm using (potentialFoam, SimpleFoam, rhoTurbFoam). Indeed I found these different lines in the 0/p files:

p: [0 2 -2 0 0 0 0] m^2/s^2

p: [1 -1 -2 0 0 0 0] Kg/(m*s^2)

Could someone please clarify this issue??
thanks

dino
dinonettis is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 28, 2008, 11:23
Default The momentum equation's divide
  #2
Senior Member
 
Sandeep Menon
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Amherst, MA
Posts: 403
Rep Power: 25
deepsterblue will become famous soon enough
The momentum equation's divided by density in the first case, and hence the consistency for pressure dimensions. (You'll have kinematic viscosity here)
__________________
Sandeep Menon
University of Massachusetts Amherst
https://github.com/smenon
deepsterblue is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 28, 2008, 17:55
Default Hi Sandeep, thanks for your
  #3
Member
 
Leonardo Nettis
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 72
Rep Power: 17
dinonettis is on a distinguished road
Hi Sandeep,

thanks for your clarification. Anyway, do you mean that if we are in the first case the value to impose in the BC is p/rho (and not simply the pressure)?? Am I right?
thank you in advance.

dino
dinonettis is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 24, 2009, 14:01
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Milos Stanic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Novi Sad, Serbia
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 17
milos is on a distinguished road
Yes, you are right... It confused me too. Do you know by any chance what does it actually mean if I change my outlet pressure BC to any other number than 0?
milos is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 25, 2009, 03:23
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Alberto Passalacqua
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ames, Iowa, United States
Posts: 1,912
Rep Power: 36
alberto will become famous soon enoughalberto will become famous soon enough
Little exercise: try with simpleFoam to change the pressure at the outlet at different values, let's say p_outlet = 0, 50 and 1000. Then compare the velocity and pressure fields. What do you notice? Why? What kind of flow are you solving for (hint rho = const)? :-)
__________________
Alberto Passalacqua

GeekoCFD - A free distribution based on openSUSE 64 bit with CFD tools, including OpenFOAM. Available as in both physical and virtual formats (current status: http://albertopassalacqua.com/?p=1541)
OpenQBMM - An open-source implementation of quadrature-based moment methods.

To obtain more accurate answers, please specify the version of OpenFOAM you are using.
alberto is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 25, 2009, 14:14
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Oleksiy Kurenkov
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nueremberg
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 17
evrikon is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to evrikon
Hello together,

I use simpleFoam and I also found that the pressure used in OF is normalized llike p/rho. Question: what I do see in in Paraview as the pressure is p/rho or really pressure?
evrikon is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 26, 2009, 03:34
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Milos Stanic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Novi Sad, Serbia
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 17
milos is on a distinguished road
As far as I noticed, what you see in ParaView by default (if boundary conditions are default) is p/rho in its relative form, where 1 is the pressure at the outlet (in boundary conditions set as 0). To switch to the relative pressure in [bar] unit you should divide the default number with 100.

To set things a bit clearer, I have attached a photo of my project where you can see the pressure distribution along the pipe elbow. If my interpretation is correct, the numbers on the scale say that if pressure on the outlet was 1bar, then the other pressures along the pipe would be 1+"number from the scale". For example the pressure on the outer side of the elbow would then be 1.407bar and on the inside the pressure would be 0.519.

P.S. - To Alberto: I'll give it a thought as soon as I catch some time. The thing that is bothering me is when I set my outlet pressure to 0, the simulation diverges and if I set it to 0.1, then it works perfectly!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg p_p_01_U_11.jpg (17.6 KB, 24 views)
milos is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 26, 2009, 15:31
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Alberto Passalacqua
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ames, Iowa, United States
Posts: 1,912
Rep Power: 36
alberto will become famous soon enoughalberto will become famous soon enough
Hi Milos,

could you please post your diverging case (if it's not huge to run)? It seems very strange to me the divergence is caused by the pressure at the outlet.

Regards,
__________________
Alberto Passalacqua

GeekoCFD - A free distribution based on openSUSE 64 bit with CFD tools, including OpenFOAM. Available as in both physical and virtual formats (current status: http://albertopassalacqua.com/?p=1541)
OpenQBMM - An open-source implementation of quadrature-based moment methods.

To obtain more accurate answers, please specify the version of OpenFOAM you are using.
alberto is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 26, 2009, 16:31
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Milos Stanic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Novi Sad, Serbia
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 17
milos is on a distinguished road
Sure, but the thing is .zip or .tar package exceed the allowed size and if I try uploading the files independently - it reports some sort of error. Got an idea how to do it? If you would like I can send it directly to your e-mail ( .tar.gz is around 3.3 MB)?

I did some roaming concerning that outlet pressure issue, found some literature and advices so after I do my reading and contemplating - I'll get back to you. Hopefully with a good understanding of how it all goes.

Cheers!
milos is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 26, 2009, 16:41
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Alberto Passalacqua
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ames, Iowa, United States
Posts: 1,912
Rep Power: 36
alberto will become famous soon enoughalberto will become famous soon enough
You can email me (albert.passalacqua@gmail.com) the case, if you want.

Thanks,
__________________
Alberto Passalacqua

GeekoCFD - A free distribution based on openSUSE 64 bit with CFD tools, including OpenFOAM. Available as in both physical and virtual formats (current status: http://albertopassalacqua.com/?p=1541)
OpenQBMM - An open-source implementation of quadrature-based moment methods.

To obtain more accurate answers, please specify the version of OpenFOAM you are using.
alberto is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Who can answer me /pressure question pam FLUENT 7 June 23, 2007 08:50
Pressure Question Inge FLUENT 0 April 9, 2004 10:40
question about pressure leo Main CFD Forum 3 April 8, 2003 07:51
Gas pressure question Dan Moskal Main CFD Forum 0 October 24, 2002 23:02


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:57.