CFD Online Discussion Forums

CFD Online Discussion Forums (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam-solving/)
-   -   Strange behaviour when using LienCubicKE and NonlinearKEShih (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam-solving/59405-strange-behaviour-when-using-liencubicke-nonlinearkeshih.html)

akbarMohammadiAhmar March 6, 2013 11:06

I am agree with you
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jkim (Post 404982)
Is there anyone who knows correct generation term for nonlinear turbulence model?

In all the nonlinear models in OpenFoam, the generation term looks like
G = nu_t * symm(grad(U)) && grad(U) - nonlinear_term (1)

I think the first term of G must be same as one in linear models.
In linear models such as kEpsilon,
G = nu_t * 2 * symm(grad(U)) && grad(U) (2)
= nu_t * 2 * magSqr(symm(gradU))

I can't understand why factor 2 is omitted in eq. (1).

If you know the reason or the correct generation for nonlinear turbulence model, please give your help to me.

Many thanks

************************************************** *
Hi jkim,
I agree with you , Because I work with nonlinear models for example quadratic Shih .
when that me use the first term of G (nu_t * symm(grad(U)) && grad(U)) result of solution
is uncorrect .:(
But , I run same model with G = nu_t * 2 * symm(grad(U)) && grad(U)- nonlinear_term that result is very good.:)
so, I think your opinion is correct.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29.