- **OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD**
(*https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam-solving/*)

- - **ODE solver extension to RKtime integration for CFD**
(*https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam-solving/59418-ode-solver-extension-rktime-integration-cfd.html*)

I'm working on RK time integraI'm working on RK time integration for a compressible flow solver.
I now would like to implement the RK-solver as an extension of the ODE/ODEsolver class. I understand that current ODE class only solves a system of scalar equations, while I obviously need to solve a mix of scalar/vector equations. I was thinking of doing something like: - specify n_scalars and n_vectors - specify y_scalars and y_vectors as well as dydx_scalars and dydx_vectors Could anybody suggest a better way ? Regards, Luca G. |

Yes: the ODE solver works withYes: the ODE solver works with the coeffs array and does not care much what's in it. Therefore, make an array of the size of number of scalars + 3*number of vectors, load up all the scalars and individual components into the coeffs and after the solution fill them back into your vectors. That way no intervention is required in the ODE base class or the solver and you will have a natural interface for scalars and vectors in your ODE.
Enjoy, Hrv |

Thanks Hrvoje,
I was also tThanks Hrvoje,
I was also thinking of copying the components of the vector field into scalar fields and then back to the vector field, but wouldn't this cost the extra time to copy the fields back and forth ? Is there any way to avoid the copy ? Regards, Luca |

There are ways, but it hurts. There are ways, but it hurts. In any case, the cost of copy is probably negligible. All field etc copies in OpenFOAM will cost you around 4% CPU time in total and there are some massive things being copied like for example matrices.
Unless you are solving hundreds of thousands of ODEs per time-step, I wouldn't sweat it. Hrv |

Well, actually I will be solviWell, actually I will be solving for each cell in the grid which means millions of ODEs per time-step, plus there will be the extra memory usage of a copy of the fields.
It doesn't look optimal, although I agree it will probably increase only a few percent CPU time. Luca |

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:19. |