|
[Sponsors] |
June 11, 2007, 05:36 |
As I understood it from the Za
|
#1 |
Member
Fabian Peng Karrholm
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 61
Rep Power: 17 |
As I understood it from the Zagreb meeting, there's some interest in how solvers perform in parallel. Since I did some limited testing on our cluster I thought I'd post the speedup rates here. First a description of the cluster:
252 nodes of 4 Xeon 5160 (Woodcrest) 3 GHz cores (dual dual core) MPI over gigbit etehernt The case: 64k cells, hex-mesh, about 10x10x10 cm^3 size Conditions are above autoignition conditions, so it starts to react rather quickly. Chemistry mechanism of 250+ reactions, 60+ species, injection speed is 700 m/s Courant number of 0.1, nCorrectors=3, residuals at 1e-6, limitedLinear for most div-terms, Euler in time I've run it for 1 hour on 4 processors (which is only on one node and doesn't require network except for file access), 8 and 12 processors. So results normalised to the 4 processor case: processors: 4 8 12 speedup: 4 7.3404 10.5819 Come to think of it, this isn't really a test of the lagrangian particles in parallel, as it's only max 50 parcels, and they are most likely always on just one processor (the one closest to the injector). I used a metis decomposition. If I have time I'll run some of any of the tutorials but with a finer mesh, so it's easier to compare. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parallel UDF | Karo | FLUENT | 2 | April 25, 2017 02:36 |
Parallel | pi | FLUENT | 1 | December 25, 2008 13:46 |
parallel CCM+ | tom | Siemens | 5 | May 8, 2008 19:54 |
Parallel UDF | ccc | FLUENT | 0 | December 3, 2004 23:17 |
CFX-5.5 Parallel NT | Kawena | CFX | 4 | March 13, 2002 21:24 |