
[Sponsors] 
April 7, 2007, 10:15 
Hi,
I am running rasInterFo

#1 
Senior Member

Sponsored Links
I am running rasInterFoam for a freesurface piercing NACA 0024 hydrofoil at Fr = 0.55. Overall, the solution looks quite good with nice resolution of the bow wave, the wave profile, and the spilling breaking wave. So, what's the issue? I've run both coarse (~0.3M cells) and fine (~2M cells) hex meshes, and have some nonphysical small amplitude waves in the gamma field which are seen on the gamma=0.5 isosurface (i.e., the free surface). Anyone have suggestions on fvSchemes settings to eliminate this problem? I am using standard rasInterFoam settings, // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // ddtSchemes { default Euler; } gradSchemes { default Gauss linear; } divSchemes { div(rho*phi,U) Gauss upwind; div(phi,gamma) Gauss limitedLinear01 1; div(phirb,gamma) Gauss limitedLinear01 1; div(phi,k) Gauss upwind; div(phi,epsilon) Gauss upwind; div(phi,R) Gauss upwind; div(R) Gauss linear; div(phi,nuTilda) Gauss upwind; } laplacianSchemes { default Gauss linear corrected; } interpolationSchemes { default linear; interpolate(HbyA) linear; } snGradSchemes { default corrected; } fluxRequired { default no; pd; pcorr; gamma; } // ************************************************** *********************** // To get an idea of what I am seeing, I've put a couple of animations (naca0024...) for download at: http://homepage.mac.com/egpaterson/FileSharing2.html Thanks, Eric 

Sponsored Links 
April 8, 2007, 18:18 
Try:
div(phi,gamma) Gaus

#2 
Senior Member
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,802
Rep Power: 24 
Try:
div(phi,gamma) Gauss Gamma01 1; div(phirb,gamma) Gauss Gamma01 1; Hrv
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk 

April 9, 2007, 19:02 
Hrv,
I tried the Gamma01 sc

#3 
Senior Member

Hrv,
I tried the Gamma01 scheme, although I did restart from the exisiting solution. However, it had no noticable impact. We'll have to do some more digging to understand this better. Eric 

April 11, 2007, 03:13 
Hi Eric
I have had the same

#4 
New Member
Joakim Möller
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 10 
Hi Eric
I have had the same problems using interFoam. The only way I have found to eliminate the overshoots is to use div(rho*phi,U) Gauss upwind; div(phi,gamma) Gauss upwind; Regards /Joakim 

April 12, 2007, 11:02 
Hi Joakim,
Thanks, as you c

#5 
Senior Member

Hi Joakim,
Thanks, as you can see from the image which compares upwind vs. limitedLinear01 on gamma , the upwind scheme took care of the problem as would be expected with a first order scheme. However, it also smoothed the diverging wave in the wake. I'm going to test out the other TVD schemes. Eric 

May 1, 2007, 16:26 
Hello,
I am continuing to w

#7 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hello,
I am continuing to work on this case. I would like to get a 2ndorder scheme working without the nonphysical waves that were smoothed out by upwind. Currently I am working with rasInterFoam, FR=0.55, coarse (~246,000 cell) grid. This is the same case Eric posted about above, all is the same except my fvSchemes dict which is below: // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // ddtSchemes { default Euler; } gradSchemes { default Gauss linear; } divSchemes { div(rho*phi,U) Gauss MUSCL; div(phi,gamma) Gauss MUSCL; div(phirb,gamma) Gauss MUSCL; div(phi,k) Gauss upwind; div(phi,epsilon) Gauss upwind; div(phi,R) Gauss upwind; div(R) Gauss linear; div(phi,nuTilda) Gauss upwind; } laplacianSchemes { default Gauss linear corrected; } interpolationSchemes { default linear; interpolate(HbyA) MUSCL; } snGradSchemes { default corrected; } fluxRequired { default no; pd; pcorr; gamma; } // ************************************************** *********************** // Has anyone had any experience/problems implementing MUSCL? I've run the following to attempt to get the solution started: (1) water/air density ratio: 1000:100 CFL=0.1 ran OK for 75 time steps (2) 1000:10 CFL=0.1 Did not work in that pcorr iterations were >5000 and/or deltaT was less than 1e33 or CFL greater than 1.0 (3) changed to CFL=0.05, 0.04, 0.03 crashed in a similar manner (4) changed the water/air density ratio to 1000:100 again and CFL=0.1: Runs OK! (5) changed density ratio to 1000:50 CFL=0.1 runs OK (6) changed density ratio to 1000:1 CFL=0.1, 0.05, 0.025, 0.0125, 0.00625 crashed as above My next thought is to try ratio of 1000:10. Any thoughts/comments/suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Ryan Carley 

May 2, 2007, 08:49 
Have you tried OF1.4 with the

#8 
Senior Member
Eugene de Villiers
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 725
Rep Power: 14 
Have you tried OF1.4 with the MULES scheme for gamma yet?
You categorically cannot run Gamma with a scheme that is not strictly bounded between 0 and 1, e.g. MULES or gamma01 

May 2, 2007, 08:59 
Belay that, just check the OF1

#9 
Senior Member
Eugene de Villiers
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 725
Rep Power: 14 
Belay that, just check the OF1.4 tutorials for what schemes to use on gamma.


Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Surface Piercing Foil  dkingsley  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  0  September 23, 2008 14:28 
Surface Piercing Foil  dkingsley  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  0  September 23, 2008 14:18 
Small Wiggles in Hydrofoil Pressure Distribution  James Date  CFX  13  May 18, 2005 04:30 
Difficult BCs about Freesurface Simulation by VOF  Yongguang Cheng  FLUENT  0  September 19, 2003 07:39 
FreeSurface simulation  Chengxuan Fu  Siemens  0  January 27, 2001 07:08 
Sponsored Links 