# Strange epsilon

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 September 13, 2006, 03:23 I am running a simulation with #1 Member   chris book Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 85 Rep Power: 10 Sponsored Links I am running a simulation with the standart k-epsilon model. I have specified an initial condition for k=9.5 and epsilon=1750. However the volume averaged epsilon after the first time step is = 3700! Can anybody shed some light into it why the volume averaged epsilon is some much different form the initial condition?

 September 13, 2006, 05:53 That's because your turbelence #2 Senior Member   Hrvoje Jasak Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: London, England Posts: 1,802 Rep Power: 24 That's because your turbelence is huge! Your velocity FLUCTUATION is 3.5 m/s - this is the speed I have trouble to walk on. Assuming turbulence intensity of 1%, your mean velocity would be the speed of sound (with a lot of turbulence). I would revisit my initial condition, it does not look right. Hrv __________________ Hrvoje Jasak Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk

 September 13, 2006, 06:12 Hrv, I think a velocity flu #3 Member   chris book Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 85 Rep Power: 10 Hrv, I think a velocity fluctuation of 3.5 m/s corresponds not to k=9.4 m^2/s^2, instead a fluctuation of 2.52 m/s is right. Do you agree ? The turbulence data (velocity fluctuation, integral lengthscale) comes from a experimental turbulence generator (multihole plate) with an integral lenghtscale of 3mm. In the experiment I want to simulate there is almost no mean flow but there is a sort of background turbulence created by the turbulence generator. So do you still think there is a incorrect initial condition?

 September 13, 2006, 06:17 Ah, OK: if you have a turbulen #4 Senior Member   Hrvoje Jasak Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: London, England Posts: 1,802 Rep Power: 24 Ah, OK: if you have a turbulence generator and experiments, this may well be right. In that case, you should just let the flow develop and the model should do its job. As for k, I probably made a mistake: k = 3/2 uPrime^2 I should have said 2.5 m/s, i.e walking speed :-) Hrv __________________ Hrvoje Jasak Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk

 September 13, 2006, 07:58 Hi, Epsilon usually scales #5 Member   Ola Widlund Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sweden Posts: 87 Rep Power: 10 Hi, Epsilon usually scales something like K^1.5/(0.3*L). In your case this is 3e4. In that light the value after one time step is not very high, rather your initial value is very small. /Ola

 September 13, 2006, 09:03 ok but the same case running w #6 Member   chris book Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 85 Rep Power: 10 ok but the same case running with star give me averaged epsilons from 2000..6000! So I don't know where the big difference gomes into the game

 October 24, 2006, 09:05 What is resonable choice for e #7 Member   chris book Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 85 Rep Power: 10 What is resonable choice for epsilon (I use the compressible RNG-k-epilon model) in the case of no initial turbulence (i.e. k=1e-8)?

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post henning OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 January 7, 2009 03:54 henning OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 December 16, 2008 09:42 henning OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 December 16, 2008 09:34 Ricardo Rezende Main CFD Forum 5 May 1, 2007 05:38 bob FLUENT 1 May 12, 2004 03:16