|
[Sponsors] |
April 17, 2019, 10:49 |
Problem with the swirlInletVelocity BC
|
#1 |
New Member
Slim
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 7 |
Hi to all.
I am trying to simulate a flame out of a swirl burner. The figure attached shows the domain I am working on. By the way, for now, I am only interested on the outlet of the burner and not in what happens inside. I used gmsh to create the mesh and import it to openFoam. The mesh consists of 2 circular surfaces which are supposed to be the outlet of the burner. So the burner consists of two outlets; the inner surface is the outlet where the flow only follows the x-direction and the outer surface is the outlet where the flow encounters the fins to create swirling movement. Finally, the box represents the atmosphere where the flame is supposed to develop. For the surface where the flow comes with some swirling motion I would like to use the "swirlInletVelocity" BC but openfoam gives me an error message: "Essential entry 'value' missing" like it's working with the "fixedValue" type. I am not what you can call an openFoam expert so I am a bit lost here. What do you think I should change to make it run? And do you think this is the best way to simulate a swirling flow? Sorry if I am not clear enough, so please feel free to ask me for more information and thank you for your help. |
|
January 16, 2020, 21:24 |
I am also getting the same error
|
#2 |
New Member
BTmaxxx
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 6 |
Hello,
Did you find the solution to this? |
|
January 16, 2020, 21:45 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Svetlana Tkachenko
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Australia, Sydney
Posts: 407
Rep Power: 14 |
Can you post your {} block in which the type is set to 'swirlInletVelocity' - then someone can suggest how to modify it? Also post the complete error message.
|
|
January 17, 2020, 00:16 |
|
#4 |
New Member
BTmaxxx
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 6 |
This the error message I am getting
--> FOAM FATAL IO ERROR: Essential entry 'value' missing file: /home/yogesh/OpenFOAM/yogesh-7/run/t4/0/U.boundaryField.inlet_ch from line 24 to line 29. From function Foam::fvPatchField<Type>::fvPatchField(const Foam::fvPatch&, const Foam:imensionedField<Type, Foam::volMesh>&, const Foam::dictionary&, bool) [with Type = Foam::Vector<double>] in file /home/ubuntu/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-7/src/finiteVolume/lnInclude/fvPatchField.C at line 97. FOAM exiting and this is the block in 0/U { type swirlInletVelocity; axis (0 0 0.004); origin (0 0 -0.005) ; axialVelocity constant 23.0; radialVelocity constant 0.1; tangentialVelocity constant 0.1; } I have swirling flow in an annular region. Do I have to include some filename in 0/U while using the derived fvPatchFields? |
|
January 17, 2020, 00:37 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Svetlana Tkachenko
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Australia, Sydney
Posts: 407
Rep Power: 14 |
Thanks - could you please post the complete contents of the '0/U' file here?
|
|
January 17, 2020, 00:40 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Yogesh Bapat
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 102
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello,
You need to provide entry like value uniform (0 0 0); Once simulation starts BC will calculate velocity value at the boundary. |
|
January 17, 2020, 00:46 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Svetlana Tkachenko
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Australia, Sydney
Posts: 407
Rep Power: 14 |
Thanks - I was looking for an example in the openfoam tutorials but did not find any with this type.
Does someone have a working tutorial case with this BC? It could be added to the official tutorials for this openfoam distribution. |
|
January 18, 2020, 10:38 |
|
#8 |
New Member
BTmaxxx
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 6 |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UDF compiling problem | Wouter | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 6 | June 6, 2012 04:43 |
Gambit - meshing over airfoil wrapping (?) problem | JFDC | FLUENT | 1 | July 11, 2011 05:59 |
natural convection problem for a CHT problem | Se-Hee | CFX | 2 | June 10, 2007 06:29 |
Adiabatic and Rotating wall (Convection problem) | ParodDav | CFX | 5 | April 29, 2007 19:13 |
Is this problem well posed? | Thomas P. Abraham | Main CFD Forum | 5 | September 8, 1999 14:52 |