CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Boundary Conditions for two dimensional cases

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 15, 2005, 06:23
Default I am in the process of validat
Posts: n/a
I am in the process of validating OpenFOAM for couple of standard benchmark cases for turbulent flows with heat transfer. I already have converged solution by Fluent and wants to see how OpenFOAM compares. As a first case, I took validation for "backward facing step" and converted fluent mesh to OpenFOAM mesh. While running this case in OpenFOAM with "empty" BC, flow development was not accurate. But results looks much better if I use "slip wall" BC. As it is recommended to use "empty" BC for 2D cases, why do I see such a discrepancy? Two dofferent 3D Fluent grids were used, with one/three elements in the "Z" direction. I have also looked at the example case "simpleFoam", available in the OpenFOAM "tutorials" directory.
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 15, 2005, 06:33
Default "empty" BC is only correct for
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 854
Rep Power: 15
henry is on a distinguished road
"empty" BC is only correct for 2D cases, that is cases which are 1 cell thick with the front and back planes parallel. Cases which are more than one cell think or non-parallel front and back planes are not 2D because they allow flow in the third direction and are hence 3D. For such cases you must define all BCs and the fron and back planes may be either symmetry, cyclic or walls depending on how you want to constrain the flow in the 3rd direction.
henry is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 15, 2005, 06:43
Default Thanks Henry for the replay. A
Posts: n/a
Thanks Henry for the replay. As I mentioned, I tried running two cases, one with one cell thick and another with three cells thick. I faced the same problem. It works well with "slip" conditions. I faced convergence problem even with "symmetry" BC. Any thought.

  Reply With Quote

Old   July 15, 2005, 07:37
Default Sorry for creating a confusion
Posts: n/a
Sorry for creating a confusion. Earlier we created a 3D grid with one cell in the "Z" direction in Gambit and tried to run it in the OpenFOAM. Basically I was not aware that it is possible to convert a 2D Fluent grid to Foam grid. This time we tried and it works with "empty" BC. Thanks Henry for your suggestions.

Now I want to apply a profile for the velocity and turbulence quantities at the inlet. How do I do that?

  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Burgerbs equation non constant Boundary Conditions Initial Conditions arkangel OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 October 2, 2008 14:48
boundary conditions for boundary layer flow A. Al-zoubi CFX 0 November 3, 2007 08:11
Integral boundary conditions turbulent intensitylength boundary conditions olesen OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 July 27, 2006 07:18
test cases for 2D boundary layers roxana Main CFD Forum 0 April 13, 2002 09:25
test cases for 2D turbulent boundary layers roxana tiron Main CFD Forum 0 April 12, 2002 06:42

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:10.