CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Courant number 1 and still stable

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 22, 2005, 09:47
Default HI, I recently ran a case
Pei-Ying Hsieh (Hsieh)
Posts: n/a
Sponsored Links

I recently ran a case using Fluent:
VOF, 2 immiscible fluids (air and water), no phase change, axi-symmetric flow, double precision, surface tension constant and wall contact angle specified on two different walls (70 and 90 degree).

Dominant flow direction is in X-direction.
samllest element in X-dir is 2e-5 meter, specified inlet velocity is 50 m/sec (the highest speed in the domain is around 100 m/s). Specified delta T is 1e-5 (constant). Based on these values, CFL: is around 50. Under-relaxation factor for pressure was set to 0.5, for density, momentum, and body force were all set to 0.6. I still got a reasonable solution.

I built a OpenFOam case using the same parameters (except for the under-relaxation factors, I have no idea where these are set when using PISO scheme). If I appled auto-adjustable delta t, then, the delta t quickly dropped to 1e-12. If I force it the stay at constant delta t, then, solution quickly diverged.

Any suggestion? Thanks!

  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Old   February 22, 2005, 12:44
Default The piso scheme does not allo
Mattijs Janssens (Mattijs)
Posts: n/a
The piso scheme does not allow underrelaxation. There is no equivalent steady state solver for vof so you are bound by the time step limitation. However your value is much too low and probably the result of an incorrect setup. Check the discussion thread on extending the inlet.

  Reply With Quote

Old   February 22, 2005, 21:05
Default Hi, Mattijs, This is a tra
Pei-Ying Hsieh (Hsieh)
Posts: n/a
Hi, Mattijs,

This is a transient problem.

I am just wondering why my fluent calculation did not diverge. The converged solution did match our experimental data though.

I am checking my OpenFOAM setup anyway.

  Reply With Quote

Old   February 23, 2005, 07:12
Default If it is a transient problem
Henry Weller (Henry)
Posts: n/a
If it is a transient problem why did it converge?
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 23, 2005, 09:08
Default Hi, Henry, In Fluent, it i
Pei-Ying Hsieh (Hsieh)
Posts: n/a
Hi, Henry,

In Fluent, it iterates within each time step until solution converges within that time step, then march to next time step. I did get a converge solution within each time step - this is what I meant by "converge".

I am puzzling why the solution did not quickly diverge when running Fluent - I am just asking possible reason(s) for this.

  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
On the Courant number . raintung FLUENT 4 June 2, 2016 12:26
Courant Number Aaron Latty CFX 16 November 12, 2012 19:27
courant number cfdworker FLUENT 0 February 4, 2006 11:26
Courant number 999.999 PetrK CFX 3 December 15, 2005 12:07
Courant Number Parshant Dhand FLUENT 1 April 29, 2003 20:39

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44.