|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Hi Foamers,
I am using the LES solver to solve a variable density problem, which is of course not compressible. Anyway, the point is that when I use the following gradient scheme, I get an error of "segmentation fault": gradSchemes { default Gauss QUICK phi; grad(p) Gauss QUICK phi; grad(U) Gauss QUICK phi; } Anybody knows what the problem is? Any help would be appreciated. Maani |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Niels Nielsen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NJ - Denmark
Posts: 556
Rep Power: 28 ![]() |
Hi
The error output would be very helpful. And maybe a better description of the physical problem you are solving.
__________________
Linnemann PS. I do not do personal support, so please post in the forums. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Quote:
Thanks for the reply. The case is that of a density current, in which a fluid of a higher density is released under an another low density fluid. The difference between their densities creates a shear layer between them and this results in a turbulent flow in common interface. I am using the LES solver (dynamic smagorinsky) plu vanDriest delta, and I have added a code to solve for the variable density there. When I choose the QUICK scheme for the gradient, before the first time step, the code gives: ... Time=0.01 segmentation fault and that's all. You might want to try it yourself!? Any help would be appropriated of course. Yous sincerely, Maani |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Well, I forgot to ask but it would be great if you could give me an idea about the following parameters: 1) max cell expansion ratio in B.L. 2) max cell aspect ratio 3) max Courant number
Yours sincerely, Mani |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2nd order upwind and QUICK scheme | Wiroon | Main CFD Forum | 19 | September 17, 2019 04:47 |
| Implementation of QUICK scheme | Romuald Skoda | Main CFD Forum | 11 | November 6, 2017 22:20 |
| 2nd order boundary condition for QUICK scheme | Jafarnia | Main CFD Forum | 0 | February 25, 2004 10:03 |
| Quick Scheme | Mikel A. | Main CFD Forum | 2 | February 23, 2004 13:58 |
| QUICK scheme | kim | FLUENT | 1 | August 29, 2002 11:16 |