 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
symmetryPlane condition: differences between 1.5 and 1.6.x |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 1, 2010, 06:21
|
[SOLVED] symmetryPlane condition: differences between 1.5 and 1.6.x
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Emanuele
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 110
Rep Power: 18  |
Hi, i m trying to use interFoam 1.6.x and compare the results with rasInterFoam (1.5) previously used. I have the same mesh but the values of p is not symmetric on symmetryPlane defined in boundary file (in v1.5 p field is symmetric!!). I'd like to know if there is some differences from symmetryPlane bc between v1.5 and v1.6.x. If not, where can i find the parameters that are ruining my simulation?
Regards EDIT: Solved. My error on setting gravity force Last edited by nuovodna; April 1, 2010 at 06:52. Reason: Solved |
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MRFSimpleFoam differences between 1.5 and 1.6 | deepblue17 | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 0 | February 26, 2010 15:59 |
| interFoam in 1.6.x, solver's slightly changed from 1.5; is p = pd? | kjetil | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | December 15, 2009 19:41 |
| the differences between 2 set ups in Fluent for initial condition | solefire | FLUENT | 2 | August 12, 2009 08:52 |
| SymmetryPlane Boundary Condition | raytracer | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | July 11, 2008 18:04 |
| CFX4.3 -build analysis form | Chie Min | CFX | 5 | July 13, 2001 00:19 |
Linear Mode
