|
[Sponsors] |
August 5, 2010, 04:56 |
|
#21 | |
Member
Sebastian Saegeler
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Munich
Posts: 70
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello!
Thank you a lot for all your advices. I think it will take me a while untill I have tested it all. But I dont really understand this expression : Quote:
Over night I run a calculation where I have changed the fixed values at the inlets for k and epsilon. I looked into the fluent solution, where I have variable BCs according to turbulent viscosity ratio and turbulent intensity. Now what I did is, I took the values from there and changed the one in OF. Then I continued the calculation from it500 and it didnt diverge at it600. Its still running and now I am at it 2000. Still have the bounding problem, but at least its running. So I also expect its not good to use the fixedValue bc at the inlets for k and epsilon. I already tried to use the "turbulentIntensityKineticEnergyInlet" and the "turbulentMixingLengthDissipationRateInlet". But as mentioned, the calculation crashes after only a few iterations. No idea want went wrong. Can anybody have a look at my case. You will find my bc for k and epsilon in /0. The files are epsilon.functions and k.functions. Thanks!! Sebastian |
||
August 5, 2010, 05:06 |
|
#22 |
Senior Member
Christian Lucas
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 202
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,
just a short remark. In the epsilon inlet function you used the wrong length. The length has to be given in meter not mm. Regards, Christian |
|
August 5, 2010, 09:27 |
|
#23 |
Member
Sebastian Saegeler
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Munich
Posts: 70
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi Christian!
Of course, youre right, i forgot the e-3 behind the values. Now it starts calculating and at least its still running But for the turbulentIntensityKineticEnergyInlet something still is going wrong! I have calculated the initial values like this: Initial U=10 m/s, turbulence intensity is 5%, so: k=3/2(0,05*10)^2=0.325 ... and so on. Here, thats my k file, maybe anybody has an idea: dimensions [0 2 -2 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform 0.0001; boundaryField { core_inlet { type turbulentIntensityKineticEnergyInlet; intensity 0.05; // 5% turbulence value uniform 0.375; } fan_inlet { type turbulentIntensityKineticEnergyInlet; intensity 0.05; // 5% turbulence value uniform 0.375; } farfield_inlet { type turbulentIntensityKineticEnergyInlet; intensity 0.001; // 0.1% turbulence value uniform 1.5e-4; } walls { type kqRWallFunction; value uniform 1; } farfield_outlet { type zeroGradient; } } If I do initialize everything with k=1, and also set the bc at the inlet to this fixed value, its running.. but thats not a good way to do so.. I am also not so sure about, if I have set the turbulent lenght scales correctly in my turbulentMixingLengthDissipationRateInlet bc. At the Inlets of my core and fan stream, I just said its 5% of my channel height. At the Inlet of my farfield, I also used 5% of my domain height. Do you think thats a reasonable guess?? I would be pleased if I get some further help of you!! Thanks a lot! Sebastian |
|
September 18, 2010, 09:04 |
units turbulentMixingLengthDissipationRateInlet
|
#24 |
New Member
Patty
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi
I am not a specialist but having the same problem (blowing up) I had a look at Sebastian 0/e file and he mentioned a factor turbulentMixingLengthDissipationRateInlet = 15 with a comment //15mm In the following web reference /html/classturbulentMixingLengthDissipationRateInletFvPa tchScalarField.html it is said the units to be specified are meter (and not mm). Are you sure of your units? it would change drastically the turbulence isn't it? Have you a comment? did you solve your problem? how? Best regards |
|
September 18, 2010, 09:17 |
|
#25 | |
Senior Member
maddalena
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 436
Rep Power: 23 |
Hello,
Quote:
cheers mad |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nonlinear k epsilon Shih Model | idrama | OpenFOAM | 10 | March 12, 2018 13:35 |
Centrifugal Pump and Turbulence Model | Michiel | CFX | 12 | January 25, 2010 03:20 |
simulation results for k-w model and SST model | Li | CFX | 7 | June 29, 2007 04:19 |
DPM model w/ Wave model - errors in documentation | HS | FLUENT | 0 | April 12, 2006 04:37 |
K-Epsilon Model | sangit | Main CFD Forum | 2 | September 9, 2004 13:19 |