|
[Sponsors] |
March 16, 2011, 04:40 |
hint for parallel running
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 213
Rep Power: 17 |
On these days I'm running some simulations with MRFSimpleFoam solver, concerning a marine propeller. I tried different method of decomposition and I saw that metis is a bit faster than simple one (along rotation axe). I also tried to test a different use of cluster noded (I can use 1, 2 or 3 8CPU-nodes on a cluster). I'm very surprised to find out that simulations are faster on 1 single node (with 2 nodes a single iteration takes almost a double time). I know that communication among more nodes can be difficult but all this difference looks too much to me). Are there any hints or specific settings in decomposeParDict to have a better running? Maybe does it depend on the globalFaceZones? This is my decomposeParDict:
Code:
numberOfSubdomains 8; method metis; globalFaceZones ( cyclic_1Zone cyclic_2Zone symmetry_1Zone symmetry_2Zone propZone domainZone ); metisCoeffs {} |
|
March 31, 2011, 07:33 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 213
Rep Power: 17 |
Please, any idea? I checked the decomposition out: the cells are equally shared by CPUS. Can 'large' areas of globalFaceZones affect the parallel computing and make a 1-node simulation faster than a 2- or 3-nodes one? I can't understand all that difference in time consumption.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Suse10 FoamX problem | frank178 | OpenFOAM Installation | 6 | January 14, 2010 04:18 |
What do you CFD guys do during a long simulation running? | bearcat | Main CFD Forum | 5 | July 23, 2009 08:08 |
Statically Compiling OpenFOAM Issues | herzfeldd | OpenFOAM Installation | 21 | January 6, 2009 09:38 |
Kubuntu uses dash breaks All scripts in tutorials | platopus | OpenFOAM Bugs | 8 | April 15, 2008 07:52 |
star is not running the simulation in windows | Arnab | Siemens | 1 | August 2, 2004 02:40 |