|June 10, 2011, 01:33||
Standard-k-€ vs. low-Re-k-€
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 155Rep Power: 8
I have a question about the difference in the calculation of the two different turbulence models Standard-k-€ (high-Re) and a low-Re model such as LaunderSharmak€.
I think I have read that the high-Re model is proned to calculate turbulent eddies bigger than they are in reality. Alleged due to great values of viscosity.
Because of that it is allegedly better to use a low-Re model such as LaunderSharmak€ to avoid this problem.
I'm not sure if this is right, so if anyone knows something more about that please let me know.
|June 10, 2011, 03:46||
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 80Rep Power: 9
low-Re models are used in wall bounded flows with resolved boundary layer since turbulent fluctuations and therefore the turbulent viscosity (leads to a low Reynolds number) are damped near walls. So when to use a low-Re model depends on your case. Different turbulence models normally have different scopes and it is your job to find the right one for your case
you can find some details in the Fröhlich BookLarge Eddy Simulation turbulenter Strömungen p. 52
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Low Reynolds Number SST Model||Josh||CFX||39||February 19, 2014 09:47|
|low reynolds number models in Fluent||doug||Main CFD Forum||6||August 4, 2012 14:39|
|y+ value too low for use in standard wall function||Allan Cross||FLUENT||3||August 26, 2005 03:11|
|Multicomponent fluid||Andrea||CFX||2||October 11, 2004 05:12|
|CFD code for very low Re Flow||Raj||Main CFD Forum||2||May 31, 1999 22:06|