|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
johannes k.
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
hey guys.
At first, great work you're doing here. I'm completely new to openfoam, but i try to do some simulation of a gas burner. when i start the solver, the following error-message appears: Starting time loop Time = 1 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 0.0290357, No Iterations 2 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 0.0162366, No Iterations 1 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 0.014761, No Iterations 1 DILUPBiCG: Solving for h, Initial residual = 0.517934, Final residual = 0.00675935, No Iterations 1 DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 9.90403e-05, No Iterations 598 DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.401541, Final residual = 3.90591e-05, No Iterations 214 DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.0953977, Final residual = 9.29665e-06, No Iterations 266 time step continuity errors : sum local = 13.4007, global = 0.347056, cumulative = 0.347056 rho max/min : 0.821852 0.001 DILUPBiCG: Solving for omega, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 0.0530614, No Iterations 2 DILUPBiCG: Solving for k, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 0.0229082, No Iterations 2 ExecutionTime = 712.65 s ClockTime = 724 s Time = 2 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.400034, Final residual = 0.0251938, No Iterations 2 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.457358, Final residual = 0.0190353, No Iterations 2 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0.421311, Final residual = 0.0167393, No Iterations 2 DILUPBiCG: Solving for h, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 0.0557149, No Iterations 2 #0 Foam::error: ![]() #1 Foam::sigFpe::sigHandler(int) in "/opt/openfoam201/platforms/linux64GccDPOpt/lib/libOpenFOAM.so" #2 in "/lib/libc.so.6" #3 Foam::hPsiThermo<Foam: ![]() ![]() #4 Foam::hPsiThermo<Foam: ![]() ![]() #5 in "/opt/openfoam201/platforms/linux64GccDPOpt/bin/rhoSimpleFoam" #6 __libc_start_main in "/lib/libc.so.6" #7 in "/opt/openfoam201/platforms/linux64GccDPOpt/bin/rhoSimpleFoam" Floating point exception (core dumped) Would be great if anyone could help me. As i already mentioned, i'm completely new to openfoam, solvers,... Thanks in advance for your help! Johannes |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
New Member
Richard Moser
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
If you're still having this problem, can you post the content of your /constant/thermophysicalProperties dictionary file?
Richard |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
|
Hi,
I had exactly the same problem. I am trying to simulate a flow through a simple catalytic converter and I am using rhoPorousMRFSimpleFoam and I get the same error during the second iteration. I decreased the relaxation factors for p and rho to 0.05 each and that seems to work. I have decent results but unfortunately my timestep continuity error is quite high. It oscillates between 60 and 25 Kalyan |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Mihai Pruna
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boston
Posts: 195
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
check your fvsolution equation relaxation factors, make them bigger than 0.9.
you should have p and rho for field and the rest for equation relaxation factors. also checking the thermo is a good idea, post it here maybe. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
|
Mihai,
Thanks for the reply. I am sorry but i don't understand your suggestion. Do you want me to assign pressure and density relaxation to be greater than 0.9? Is there a reason why this might work? Also, I setup the case almost exactly like the tutorial case ( rhoporousMRFsimpleFOAM - angledductexplicit) and I really don't understand the reason for the problem. I tried removing the porous zone and checking how rhoSimpleFoam would work and I still have the same problem. On the other hand, I don't have any problems with the incompressible case. This surely points towards the boundary and the initial conditions of the case. Here are my boundary conditions pressure Inlet - zeroGradient Outlet - fixedValue walls -zeroGradient Velocity Inlet - flowRateInletVelocity outlet - inletOutlet walls - fixedValue ( 0 for no-slip) Temperature Inlet - fixedValue Outlet - fixedvalue walls - zeroGradient This case is supposed to be a heat transfer case and hence I have to specific temperatures on both the inlet and outlet . I am not really confident if this over does the boundary conditions. I am really sorry but the files are in my office and I don't think I have the permissions to share them. I will try my best to properly represent my case though. Thanks, Kalyan Goparaju |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Mihai Pruna
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boston
Posts: 195
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
I was struggling with the same problem and I got one case to work by setting those values in fvsolution as follows.
Be advised I am using rhoSimplecFoam . relaxationFactors { fields { p 0.810000; rho 0.810000; } equations { U 0.900000; h 0.900000; k 0.900000; omega 0.900000; } } However, I am now finding out the mesh quality might play a role as well. I will keep you posted on my findings. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
|
Mihai, u
Thanks a lot for the reply. I actually was able to solve my problem. The problem with my setup was that, the porous resistance was quite large and I somehow overlooked that and used an explicit porosity formulation which the solver didn't like. I changed the fvSolution dictionary to use the implicit porosity formulation and BAZINGA !! But, I will definitely remember your advice for future problems. Kalyan Note - I had to use a pressure under relaxation value of 0.2 and density under relaxation of 0.05. It might have worked for higher values, but I didn't want to lose my almost perfect results :-) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Mihai Pruna
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boston
Posts: 195
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
good to know
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A New Solver for Supersonic Combustion | nakul | OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources | 19 | February 27, 2024 10:44 |
[Other] A New Solver for Supersonic Combustion | nakul | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 20 | February 22, 2019 10:08 |
thobois class engineTopoChangerMesh error | Peter_600 | OpenFOAM | 4 | August 2, 2014 10:52 |
Development of a Low mach PISO solver | nishant_hull | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 0 | August 25, 2009 13:48 |
why the solver reject it? Anyone with experience? | bearcat | CFX | 6 | April 28, 2008 15:08 |