 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
Under what circumstances is DRW really valid? |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 19, 2012, 06:01
|
Under what circumstances is DRW really valid?
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 260
Rep Power: 17  |
I'm very dubious about adding an unphysical quantity to the Lagrangian particle tracking by the stochastic random walk model.
I've read in many places that without it results are poor or erroneous, equally that it's invalid for small micron size particles. What's the status quo here? Regards, |
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Errors during exporting from Gambit to Fluent | redrum | FLUENT | 3 | August 6, 2014 22:40 |
| OF 1.6 | Ubuntu 9.10 (64bit) | GLIBCXX_3.4.11 not found | piprus | OpenFOAM Installation | 22 | February 25, 2010 13:43 |
| Convergence is valid or not (with reversed flow)? | Chesers | FLUENT | 1 | January 29, 2007 23:47 |
| Gambit: Valid entity doesn't exist | Sharon | FLUENT | 0 | December 11, 2006 03:34 |
| help: Is "no-slip" valid all the time? | Pei-Ying Hsieh | Main CFD Forum | 7 | June 26, 2000 10:51 |
Linear Mode
