|
[Sponsors] |
what is the number infront of divergence or laplacian scheme in fvSchme? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 13, 2013, 17:26 |
what is the number infront of divergence or laplacian scheme in fvSchme?
|
#1 |
Senior Member
saeideh mohamadi
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 229
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi Foamers,
i have a queation that may seems to you very simple! what is the number infront of divergence or laplacian scheme in fvSchme? e.g "1.0" in div(phi,U) bounded Gauss GammaV "1.0" or "0.7" in laplacian(nuEff,U) Gauss linear limited "0.7"; what is them, and what is the effect of the decreasing or increasing them on our analysis? Thankyou Last edited by s.m; August 20, 2013 at 06:36. |
|
September 15, 2013, 03:57 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
saeideh mohamadi
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 229
Rep Power: 14 |
any guidance?
|
|
September 15, 2013, 08:49 |
|
#3 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,975
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Greetings s.m,
Quick question: Have you checked the OpenFOAM User Guide? Namely the section 4.4 Numerical schemes? There is also the Programmer's Guide, where you can find additional information. The following page provides information on where to find it and includes some corrections to this guide: http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/Op...s_Guide_Errata Best regards, Bruno
__________________
|
|
September 15, 2013, 11:22 |
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
saeideh mohamadi
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 229
Rep Power: 14 |
Quote:
yes, but i can't understand the role of the number 1.0 or 0.33 or 0.7 that is written in front of the scheme! |
||
September 15, 2013, 15:37 |
|
#5 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,975
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
If I'm not mistaken, it's the values explained in section "4.4.2 Surface normal gradient schemes".
I forgot to mention this reference wiki page as well: http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/OpenFOAM_guide - be sure to read the pages therein. Sorry that I don't have a clear answer for you, but this is just to help you find some more sources of information, until someone who knows the answer can write about it Because I don't know the exact answer you're looking for. And I do have the feeling that this has already been on the forum already... Good luck! Bruno
__________________
|
|
September 15, 2013, 15:37 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Tussenhausen
Posts: 2,708
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 51 |
In the numerical schemes with limiter its the functionallity of it like:
Code:
1 = limiter function to 100% 0.33 = limiter function to 33 % 0 = limiter function 0 % Code:
Gauss limitedLinear 0 Code:
Gauss linear |
|
September 16, 2013, 15:47 |
|
#7 | |
Senior Member
saeideh mohamadi
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 229
Rep Power: 14 |
Quote:
in laplacian scheme is "Gauss linear limited 1.0" what is this limiters do when we set the laplacian scheme set to use them? in oder words, is it better to use Gauss linear that doen't use any limiters or it is good to use limiters, why? Thank you for your guidance. |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
high cfl number and discretization scheme | Fab | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 2, 2008 12:19 |
time_step, implicit scheme, number of iterations | Isa | Main CFD Forum | 3 | May 11, 2006 12:27 |
ENO scheme and Courant number. | J. | Main CFD Forum | 2 | November 8, 2002 17:07 |
How to choose the CFL number with implicit scheme? | D.T. | Main CFD Forum | 2 | October 23, 2002 13:56 |
TVD scheme at low Mach number | Axel Rohde | Main CFD Forum | 5 | August 6, 1999 02:01 |