CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

what is the number infront of divergence or laplacian scheme in fvSchme?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By wyldckat
  • 1 Post By wyldckat

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 13, 2013, 17:26
Default what is the number infront of divergence or laplacian scheme in fvSchme?
  #1
s.m
Senior Member
 
saeideh mohamadi
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 229
Rep Power: 14
s.m is on a distinguished road
Hi Foamers,
i have a queation that may seems to you very simple!
what is the number infront of divergence or laplacian scheme in fvSchme?
e.g "1.0" in div(phi,U) bounded Gauss GammaV "1.0"
or "0.7" in laplacian(nuEff,U) Gauss linear limited "0.7";
what is them, and what is the effect of the decreasing or increasing them on our analysis?

Thankyou

Last edited by s.m; August 20, 2013 at 06:36.
s.m is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 15, 2013, 03:57
Default
  #2
s.m
Senior Member
 
saeideh mohamadi
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 229
Rep Power: 14
s.m is on a distinguished road
any guidance?
s.m is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 15, 2013, 08:49
Default
  #3
Retired Super Moderator
 
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,975
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128
wyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to all
Greetings s.m,

Quick question: Have you checked the OpenFOAM User Guide? Namely the section 4.4 Numerical schemes?

There is also the Programmer's Guide, where you can find additional information. The following page provides information on where to find it and includes some corrections to this guide: http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/Op...s_Guide_Errata

Best regards,
Bruno
s.m likes this.
__________________
wyldckat is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 15, 2013, 11:22
Default
  #4
s.m
Senior Member
 
saeideh mohamadi
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 229
Rep Power: 14
s.m is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyldckat View Post
Greetings s.m,

Quick question: Have you checked the OpenFOAM User Guide? Namely the section 4.4 Numerical schemes?

There is also the Programmer's Guide, where you can find additional information. The following page provides information on where to find it and includes some corrections to this guide: http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/Op...s_Guide_Errata

Best regards,
Bruno
Hi
yes, but i can't understand the role of the number 1.0 or 0.33 or 0.7 that is written in front of the scheme!
s.m is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 15, 2013, 15:37
Default
  #5
Retired Super Moderator
 
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,975
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128
wyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to all
If I'm not mistaken, it's the values explained in section "4.4.2 Surface normal gradient schemes".

I forgot to mention this reference wiki page as well: http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/OpenFOAM_guide - be sure to read the pages therein.

Sorry that I don't have a clear answer for you, but this is just to help you find some more sources of information, until someone who knows the answer can write about it Because I don't know the exact answer you're looking for.

And I do have the feeling that this has already been on the forum already...

Good luck!
Bruno
s.m likes this.
__________________
wyldckat is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 15, 2013, 15:37
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Tobi's Avatar
 
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Tussenhausen
Posts: 2,708
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 51
Tobi has a spectacular aura aboutTobi has a spectacular aura aboutTobi has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via ICQ to Tobi Send a message via Skype™ to Tobi
In the numerical schemes with limiter its the functionallity of it like:

Code:
1 = limiter function to 100%
0.33 = limiter function to 33 %
0 = limiter function 0 %
therefor the scheme

Code:
Gauss limitedLinear 0
should be the same as
Code:
Gauss linear
I think in the laplacian scheme its something like this, isn't it?
Tobi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 16, 2013, 15:47
Default
  #7
s.m
Senior Member
 
saeideh mohamadi
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 229
Rep Power: 14
s.m is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tobi View Post
In the numerical schemes with limiter its the functionallity of it like:

Code:
1 = limiter function to 100%
0.33 = limiter function to 33 %
0 = limiter function 0 %
therefor the scheme

Code:
Gauss limitedLinear 0
should be the same as
Code:
Gauss linear
I think in the laplacian scheme its something like this, isn't it?
Thank you Tobi,
in laplacian scheme is "Gauss linear limited 1.0"
what is this limiters do when we set the laplacian scheme set to use them?
in oder words, is it better to use Gauss linear that doen't use any limiters or it is good to use limiters, why?
Thank you for your guidance.
s.m is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
high cfl number and discretization scheme Fab Main CFD Forum 0 March 2, 2008 12:19
time_step, implicit scheme, number of iterations Isa Main CFD Forum 3 May 11, 2006 12:27
ENO scheme and Courant number. J. Main CFD Forum 2 November 8, 2002 17:07
How to choose the CFL number with implicit scheme? D.T. Main CFD Forum 2 October 23, 2002 13:56
TVD scheme at low Mach number Axel Rohde Main CFD Forum 5 August 6, 1999 02:01


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:52.