|
[Sponsors] | |||||
The simulation does not match the results in the article |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3 ![]() |
Hi, everyone!
I'm new member in OpenFOAM, currently simulating a stationary incompressible flow in a Tesla valve. Repeating the geometry (valve+2 cylinders) from the experimental article(https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/13/8/1180), I simulate the movement of the liquid and compare the pressure obtained with the results. But they don't add up. There was a hypothesis that it was necessary to grind the grid, but this does not help: I got to the difference of 2% between the simulation results, it seems to me that there is no point in grinding further. The results are still 2-3 times less than expected. I tried to take the articles that these scientists took as a basis, but still the results are much less. I multiply the resulting pressure by the density of the liquid, because I use incompressible solver. I wrote the boundary conditions below, but I don't see any errors in them: Velocity: Code:
FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class volVectorField;
object U;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //
dimensions [0 1 -1 0 0 0 0];
internalField uniform (0 0 0);
boundaryField
{
inlet
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform (-1.25 0 0);
}
outlet
{
type zeroGradient;
}
wall
{
type noSlip;
}
front
{
type noSlip;
}
back
{
type noSlip;
}
}
// *************************************************************************
Code:
FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class volScalarField;
object p;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //
dimensions [0 2 -2 0 0 0 0];
internalField uniform 0;
boundaryField
{
inlet
{
type zeroGradient;
}
outlet
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 0;
}
wall
{
type zeroGradient;
}
front
{
type zeroGradient;
}
back
{
type zeroGradient;
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| simpleFoam: Influence of MRF region dimensions on simulation results | Krao | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | March 29, 2022 22:33 |
| Difference between 2D and 3D simulation results | Tuck | FLUENT | 2 | January 9, 2021 18:43 |
| Imprecise results in SU2 Simulation of a Turbulent Susbonic Round Jet | LucaLamberti | SU2 | 1 | May 25, 2020 00:47 |
| Ahmed body simulation gives unexpected results in su2 6.0 | anas651 | SU2 | 0 | March 28, 2018 04:42 |
| Experimental results do not match with simulation results | robingilbert | OpenFOAM Verification & Validation | 4 | January 23, 2012 18:39 |