CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM

simple geometry and potentialFoam?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 21, 2012, 16:39
Default simple geometry and potentialFoam?
  #1
Super Moderator
 
Tobi's Avatar
 
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Tussenhausen
Posts: 2,708
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 51
Tobi has a spectacular aura aboutTobi has a spectacular aura aboutTobi has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via ICQ to Tobi Send a message via Skype™ to Tobi
Hi all,

I have a problem with my project. I wanna make a combustion simulation with the flamelet solver but the solver is not working (no convergence - break down). So after that I decided to try it with the rhoSimpleFoam to get the flow field for the flamlet solver.

Here the solver is still not running and I wanted to initialise the field with the potentialFoam but there are just uncorrect physical solutions (U > 1e6). Well I changed the geometry and simplifyed it till I reached a simple pipe (picture).

But I cant initialise it with the potentialFoam and now i am wondering why?
Its for my masterthesis and I am working on that problem since last friday. I thought there is a problem with my OF version or sth like that on my workstation but at home there is the same problem.

Do someone have some ideas?
potentialFoam can initialise the rhoSimplecFoam tutorial so it should be possible to initialise that simple pipe.


Here my bc for U

Code:
dimensions      [0 1 -1 0 0 0 0];

internalField   uniform (0 0 0);

boundaryField
{
    inlet
    {
        type            flowRateInletVelocity;
        flowRate        constant 0.002;
        value           uniform (0 -0 0.389333);
    }
    outlet
    {
        type            inletOutlet;
        inletValue      uniform (0 0 0);
        value           uniform (0 0 0);
    }
    wall
    {
        type            fixedValue;
        value           uniform (0 0 0);
    }
}
For p
Code:
dimensions      [0 2 -2 0 0 0 0];

internalField   uniform 1e5;

boundaryField
{
    outlet
    {
        type            fixedValue;
       value         uniform 1e5;
    }

    inlet
    {
        type            mixed;
        refValue        uniform 1e5;
        refGradient     uniform 0;
        valueFraction   uniform 0.3;
    }

    wall
    {
        type            zeroGradient;
    }

Hope for some help.
Thanks in advance
Tobi


PS: I solved complex 2phase simulations and now I am not able to solve that problem. I do not know if I should cry or laugh about that situation
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1.jpg (8.2 KB, 17 views)
File Type: jpg 2.jpg (74.0 KB, 16 views)
File Type: jpg 3.jpg (15.3 KB, 18 views)
Tobi is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
potentialFoam and Tets shogan50 OpenFOAM 17 April 29, 2010 11:43
PotentialFoam few problems chris_sev OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 July 22, 2008 10:15


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:12.