CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM

inkjet model using interFoam

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 11, 2012, 13:22
Default inkjet model using interFoam
  #1
Senior Member
 
Vishal Nandigana
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Champaign, Illinois, U.S.A
Posts: 208
Rep Power: 18
nandiganavishal is on a distinguished road
Dear Foamers,

I am trying to simulate the inkjet problem from a nozzle. I am using the interFoam solver to model the same. The geometry is similar to the one discussed in this tutorial http://www.tfd.chalmers.se/~hani/kur...Hemida_VOF.pdf

However, I was not able to get the correct results as discussed in the tutorial. I would like to know what boundary conditions have to be specified for pressure and the velocity.

I have considered the following for U

internalField uniform (0 0 0);

boundaryField
{
inlet
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform (-0.1 0 0); // water is injected at 0.1m/s
}
inletWall
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform (0 0 0);
}
bottleWall
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform (0 0 0);
}
atmosphere
{
type pressureInletOutletVelocity;
value uniform (0 0 0);
}
frontAndBack
{
type empty;
}
}

and for pressure

boundaryField
{
inlet
{
type buoyantPressure;
value uniform 0;
}

inletWall
{
type zeroGradient;
}

bottleWall
{
type zeroGradient;
}

atmosphere
{
type totalPressure;
p0 uniform 0;
U U;
phi phi;
rho rho;
psi none;
gamma 1;
value uniform 0;
}

frontAndBack
{
type empty;
}
}

while for alpha1

boundaryField
{
inlet
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 1;
}
inletWall
{
type zeroGradient;
}
bottleWall
{
type zeroGradient;
}
atmosphere
{
type inletOutlet;
inletValue uniform 0;
value uniform 0;
}
frontAndBack
{
type empty;
}


I would like to know if they are consistent.

Kindly let me know !!

Thanks

Regards

Vishal
nandiganavishal is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 11, 2012, 02:40
Default
  #2
Member
 
Alexander
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 17
sahas is on a distinguished road
I think there is the same problem with simulation of inkjet breakup due to external oscillations.

The formulation of a problem is very simple (see http://www.foamcfd.org/Nabla/main/mainhe22.html#inkJet for example): there is a water axisymmetric jet (about 100mkm diameter) with oscillating speed U0+dU*sin(Wt), U0 is about 25 m/s, dU is about 1-10%U0, W is about 1-100kHz.
It should breaks up to droplets but for interFoam 2.0 and 2.1 it does not. With OpenFoam 1.5 all is fine and is in excellent agreement with the experiment.
Sometimes later I hope to post problem formulation for OpenFOAM.

I think there is a serious bug in interFoam.

P.S. This is our article about results obtained with interFoam 1.5
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...77050910000785
sahas is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 15, 2018, 05:34
Default
  #3
Member
 
Ben 017
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 70
Rep Power: 8
Ben UWIHANGANYE is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by nandiganavishal View Post
Dear Foamers,

I am trying to simulate the inkjet problem from a nozzle. I am using the interFoam solver to model the same. The geometry is similar to the one discussed in this tutorial http://www.tfd.chalmers.se/~hani/kur...Hemida_VOF.pdf

However, I was not able to get the correct results as discussed in the tutorial. I would like to know what boundary conditions have to be specified for pressure and the velocity.

I have considered the following for U

internalField uniform (0 0 0);

boundaryField
{
inlet
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform (-0.1 0 0); // water is injected at 0.1m/s
}
inletWall
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform (0 0 0);
}
bottleWall
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform (0 0 0);
}
atmosphere
{
type pressureInletOutletVelocity;
value uniform (0 0 0);
}
frontAndBack
{
type empty;
}
}

and for pressure

boundaryField
{
inlet
{
type buoyantPressure;
value uniform 0;
}

inletWall
{
type zeroGradient;
}

bottleWall
{
type zeroGradient;
}

atmosphere
{
type totalPressure;
p0 uniform 0;
U U;
phi phi;
rho rho;
psi none;
gamma 1;
value uniform 0;
}

frontAndBack
{
type empty;
}
}

while for alpha1

boundaryField
{
inlet
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 1;
}
inletWall
{
type zeroGradient;
}
bottleWall
{
type zeroGradient;
}
atmosphere
{
type inletOutlet;
inletValue uniform 0;
value uniform 0;
}
frontAndBack
{
type empty;
}


I would like to know if they are consistent.

Kindly let me know !!

Thanks

Regards

Vishal


Hello,

Have you been able to solve that problem?
May you help also to know how I can solve the same

Regard!
Ben UWIHANGANYE is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 8, 2020, 08:49
Default
  #4
New Member
 
chchung
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
chchung is on a distinguished road
for U, it should be

value uniform (0 -0.1 0); // water is injected at 0.1m/s

as the water is dropped down in the y-direction.


for the p, I got error for buoyantPressue, so I changed it to fixedFluxPressure.
chchung is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problems bout CFD model of biomass gasification, Downdraft gasifier wanglong FLUENT 2 November 25, 2009 23:27
Reynolds Stress model in CFX vs Fluent Tim CFX 1 October 7, 2009 06:19
help for different between les model (subgrid-scale model) liuyuxuan FLUENT 1 October 2, 2009 15:25
Grid resolution for full-scale and down scaled model gravis Main CFD Forum 0 October 2, 2009 10:27
Advanced Turbulence Modeling in Fluent, Realizable k-epsilon Model Jonas Larsson FLUENT 5 March 13, 2000 03:27


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:44.