# What does uniform temperature rise mean for thermal stress analysis?

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 September 19, 2012, 14:33 What does uniform temperature rise mean for thermal stress analysis? #1 Member   Sangeeta Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Kingston, Canada Posts: 70 Rep Power: 7 Hello everybody, I am solving a thermal stress analysis problem in OpenFOAM. In my case, there is an initially undeformed cube subjected to a uniform temperature rise ΔT=T-Tr . As per my understanding, for this problem I do not need to solve energy equation. Does it means that I need to give some fix scalar value of the temperature in momentum equation for solving stresses due to temperature rise only? I appreciate if anyone could help me to understand the case. Thanks in advance. Best regards, Sangeeta mohseni likes this.

 September 21, 2012, 13:15 #2 Senior Member     Philip Cardiff Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Dublin, Ireland Posts: 654 Rep Power: 23 Hi Sangeeta, Yes you are correct that since you know the temperature distribution you do not need to solve the energy equation. And then you would subtract the thermal stress term grad(3*K*alpha*deltaT) from the momentum equation. However, to save you changing the code you could just set fixedValue T boundary conditions and solve the energy equation using solidDisplacementFoam or elasticThermalSolidFoam, it probably wouldn't add much computation time and will give you the same temperature and displacement distributions. Philip

September 22, 2012, 00:27
#3
Member

Sangeeta
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 70
Rep Power: 7
Quote:
 Originally Posted by bigphil Hi Sangeeta, Yes you are correct that since you know the temperature distribution you do not need to solve the energy equation. And then you would subtract the thermal stress term grad(3*K*alpha*deltaT) from the momentum equation. However, to save you changing the code you could just set fixedValue T boundary conditions and solve the energy equation using solidDisplacementFoam or elasticThermalSolidFoam, it probably wouldn't add much computation time and will give you the same temperature and displacement distributions. Philip

Hi Philip,

Thank you for the reply. Yes, I am using elasticThermalSolidFoam for this case. Do you think that only fixing temperature in T boundary condition is fine to get good results. Because I can only fix temperature in boundary patches for e.g.

TOP
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 100;
}
BOTTOM
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 100;
}
LEFT
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 100;
}
RIGHT
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 100;
}
FRONTANDBACK
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 100;
}

Does it means it rising uniform temperature in whole cube geometry?

Kind regards,
Sangeeta

 September 22, 2012, 11:34 #4 Senior Member     Philip Cardiff Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Dublin, Ireland Posts: 654 Rep Power: 23 Hi Sangeeta, If you fix the boundary patch temperatures and then set the ddtScheme for T to be steadyState then the internal temperature field will be uniform 100. Philip

 September 22, 2012, 21:00 #5 Member   Sangeeta Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Kingston, Canada Posts: 70 Rep Power: 7 Hi Philip, Thanks a lot for the information. I will try this. Kind regards, Sangeeta

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Mojtaba.a OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 November 16, 2017 16:49 daniel_mills OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 44 February 17, 2011 18:08 RP Main CFD Forum 1 March 28, 2008 02:22 rt Main CFD Forum 0 June 7, 2007 05:01 Boris FLUENT 0 January 27, 2003 22:11

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:28.