|
[Sponsors] |
March 15, 2013, 09:06 |
div(phi,U) scheme
|
#1 |
New Member
Robin Debroux
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi everybody,
I'm simulating a flow in a nozzle with shocks with sonicFoam. I take the fvScheme from tutorial cases and I had some questions about it. For all the terms in the ras case, it uses TVD scheme (limitedLinear) but in the laminar case, for the div(phi,U) term, it uses upwind scheme. Is there any reason? When I simulated my inviscid case for the nozzle, I tried to use limitedLinear for the div(phi,U) term but it gave me a worse solution than with upwind. I've tried to understand why but didn't find any informations. Thank you for your help. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how to understand high resolution scheme and high order scheme | iilw1314 | Main CFD Forum | 7 | April 12, 2022 12:29 |
Why define a grad Scheme when using linearUpwind? | Benedikt | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 2 | August 10, 2019 08:19 |
Implementation of QUICK scheme | Romuald Skoda | Main CFD Forum | 11 | November 6, 2017 21:20 |
2nd order upwind scheme (Fluent and CFX) | Far | FLUENT | 0 | May 22, 2011 01:50 |
extrapolation in MUSCL scheme | Chandra | Main CFD Forum | 6 | February 14, 2007 11:21 |