CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM

Plane stress and plane strain cases for stress analysis

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 3, 2013, 18:16
Default Plane stress and plane strain cases for stress analysis
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Kingston, Canada
Posts: 70
Rep Power: 7
Sargam05 is on a distinguished road
Sponsored Links
Hello everyone,

I am doing stress-stain analysis in a 3D geometry. First I started with solid cube block. In solidDisplacementFoam constant/mechanicalProperties mentions:

rho rho [ 1 -3 0 0 0 0 0 ] 5163;

nu nu [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.32;

E E [ 1 -1 -2 0 0 0 0 ] 215e+09;

planeStress no;

If I set planeStress to yes, it works for 2D (i.e. X and Y directions) and when I use
planeStress no;

It works for 3D.

I am using following boundary conditions for the solid cube:
tractiondisplacement normal to the top surface (y-direction), bottom surface is fixedDisplacement (y-direction), and other surfaces are considered as free surfaces.
For 2D block deformations will take place only X and Y directions. I have set plane stress to "yes" condition for 2D block.

For 3D solid block, traction loading is in y-direction on top surface (i.e. normal to the top surface), bottom surface is fixed, and other surfaces are considered as free surfaces. Here I have set plane stress to "no" (means plane strain condition).

In both situations, I my OpenFOAM solution matches to analytic solution.

But when I am using loading in z-direction, with following boundary conditions:
front surface (this surface is in z-direction) have traction loading in z direction (i.e. normal to the surface), back surface is fixed, and other surfaces are considered as free surfaces. In this case, I have used both plane stress and plane strain conditions but OpenFOAM solution did not match to the analytic solution.

How I can set this problem? As it says from the definition of plane stress condition that plane stress condition is used when body is subjected to transverse loading. Does in mean z-direction loading or shear stresses in each direction? Which condition would be more suitable for loading in z-direction?

I appreciate if anyone of you have any suggestion.

Best regards,
Sargam05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Buckling analysis of a simple plane truss george85 ANSYS 3 March 12, 2013 07:56
stress analysis of a rotating beam(wind blade) Cheyannne ANSYS 0 October 19, 2009 17:06

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:57.