|
[Sponsors] | |||||
Converting cylindrical anisotropic diffusivity comonents into the cartesian setting |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Sean McGinty
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 14 ![]() |
Hi
I am currently solving convection-diffusion with a simple sink term in a cube. The diffusion is anisotropic and the velocity component is unidirectional. I have modified scalarTransportFoam to handle the anisotropic diffusion and sink term. In reality, my geometry should be cylindrical. The diffusion coefficients I have are D_r, D_theta and Dz (not Dx, Dz and D_z) Furthermore, the unidirectional velocity acts radially (not along z as I have currently). I think I can modify the geometry to form a 'wedge' rather than a cube, but my question is the following: Is it possible to modify the code so that my (cylindrical) diffusion coefficients (defined along the r, theta and z directions) and radial velocity magnitude are converted appropriately into the cartesian x,y, z co-ordinate system? In an ideal word I would be solving in a cylindrical co-ordinate system which is more natural, but I'm not sure if this is possible in FOAM - please correct me if I am wrong. Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [snappyHexMesh] determining displacement for added points | CFDnewbie147 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | October 22, 2013 10:53 |
| cylindrical coordinate vs cartesian coordinate | Lam | FLUENT | 10 | May 11, 2013 14:05 |
| 3D axisymmetric flow in cylindrical coordinate = 2D cartesian flow? | shubiaohewan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | May 2, 2013 15:08 |
| Cells with t below lower limit | Purushothama | Siemens | 2 | May 31, 2010 22:58 |
| Warning 097- | AB | Siemens | 6 | November 15, 2004 05:41 |