 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
OpenFOAM vs FOAM-extend: poll on usability |
| View Poll Results: Which is better | |||
| OpenFOAM |
   
|
10 | 43.48% |
| FOAM-extend |
  
|
13 | 56.52% |
| Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 14, 2015, 18:43
|
OpenFOAM vs FOAM-extend: poll on usability
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 16  |
Which one is better to use?
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 17, 2015, 07:05
|
|
#2 |
|
New Member
Damon Lee
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 11 |
Based on what? Surely it totally depends on the case in question, for example foam-extend has some features OpenFOAM does not have like 'out of the box' solid mechanics solvers and immersed boundary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 17, 2015, 10:26
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Jon Elvar Wallevik
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Reykjavik, ICELAND
Posts: 103
Rep Power: 19 |
I agree with Lee
I have like 11 different OF versions in my OpenFOAM dir (including 1.6-ext) as well as foam-extend-3.0/ and foam-extend-3.1/ in the foam dir. I use them all, and it just depends what saves most time/is most easy + other factors. J. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [Other] mesh airfoil NACA0012 | anand_30 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 13 | March 7, 2022 17:22 |
| [blockMesh] error message with modeling a cube with a hold at the center | hsingtzu | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 14, 2012 09:56 |
| New OpenFOAM Forum Structure | jola | OpenFOAM | 2 | October 19, 2011 06:55 |
| [Other] cgnsToFoam problems with "QUAD_4" cells | lentschi | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | March 9, 2011 04:49 |
| gmsh2ToFoam | sarajags_89 | OpenFOAM | 0 | November 24, 2009 22:50 |
4Likes
Linear Mode
