|June 2, 2016, 02:54||
Is OpenFOAM right for my use case?
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 1Rep Power: 0
I am currently evaluating if OpenFOAM could be used to model a project I am working on, but I am not sure if it is the right solution.
First some background information on the case: I need a tool that can model pipe flow for cryogenic substances in three different phases (gaseous, liquid and solid particles) depending on the initial conditions. So sometimes it would be gas/liquid sometimes liquid/solid. It would always be only one species within the pipe.
Additionally I would like to simulate phase changes depending on heat flow into the pipe. However, while 3D would be nice, a 1D simulation would be sufficient for me (and be much faster).
The question I have boils down to: How does the effort to code my own specialized CFD code using a 1D finite volume method from scratch, compare to learning OpenFOAM sufficiently to employ the needed changes to existing solvers?
Background: I have experience working with C++ and Fortran but only limited experience with CFD.
Thanks in advance!
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|OpenFOAM v3.0+ ??||SBusch||OpenFOAM||22||December 26, 2016 15:24|
|Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13||msrinath80||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||18||March 3, 2015 06:36|
|ParaView 4.10 and OpenFOAM 2.3.0 Multiregion and decomposed case||romant||OpenFOAM Paraview & paraFoam||3||April 7, 2014 15:42|
|Same SimpleFOAM Case converges with openFOAM 2.1 but diverges with openFOAM 2.0.1||alsdia||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||3||October 22, 2012 11:25|
|2D Mesh Generation Tutorial for GMSH||aeroslacker||Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ...||12||January 19, 2012 04:52|