CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM

chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam - configuring solver

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 2, 2016, 12:09
Default chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam - configuring solver
  #1
Member
 
Jaydeep
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 10
jaydeep is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone,

I am trying to work with a very simple case. I have 2D case with air flowing over a solid block. The bottom surface of the solid block is at 500K. I am trying to solve it with chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam. After configuring changeDicts and manually changing some of the boundary fields, my solver crashes with the error message attached.

I am also packing the case and attaching it with the post.

I tried to work with the classic planeWall2D case and port it to OF1606+. You can find it here: http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...penfoam-4.html

It sort of works, but I am not sure about the results. So I decided to create an even simpler case with just two domains.

I would highly appreciate any help on this!

Thank you in advance.
Attached Images
File Type: png error message.png (58.1 KB, 11 views)
Attached Files
File Type: zip cht-test.zip (184.6 KB, 1 views)
jaydeep is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 2, 2016, 12:11
Default Adding mesh file for reference
  #2
Member
 
Jaydeep
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 10
jaydeep is on a distinguished road
For more information on the mesh, my mesh file (.geo):

// Gmsh project created on Tue Jul 26 09:05:04 2016
r = 1;
r2 = 0.2;
ce = 0;
pts[]={};
nearg = r/20;
Point(ce++) = {r,0,0,nearg};pts[]+=ce;
Point(ce++) = {r,r2,0,nearg};pts[]+=ce;
Point(ce++) = {0,r2,0,nearg};pts[]+=ce;
Point(ce++) = {0,0,0,nearg};pts[]+=ce;
Point(ce++) = {r,r2+r2,0,nearg};pts[]+=ce;
Point(ce++) = {0,r2+r2,0,nearg};pts[]+=ce;
Line(1) = {4, 1};
Line(2) = {1, 2};
Line(3) = {2, 3};
Line(4) = {3, 4};
Line(5) = {2, 5};
Line(6) = {5, 6};
Line(7) = {6, 3};
Line Loop(8) = {6, 7, -3, 5};
Plane Surface(9) = {8};
Line Loop(10) = {4, 1, 2, 3};
Plane Surface(11) = {10};
Transfinite Surface {9};
Transfinite Surface {11};
Recombine Surface {9};
Recombine Surface {11};
Transfinite Line {7} = 30 Using Progression 0.9;
Transfinite Line {5} = 30 Using Progression 1.1111111;
Transfinite Line {4} = 30 Using Progression 1.1111111;
Transfinite Line {2} = 30 Using Progression 0.9;
Extrude {0, 0, -0.01} {
Surface{9, 11};
Layers{1};
Recombine;
}
Physical Surface("empty1") = {9, 33};
Physical Surface("empty2") = {11, 55};
Physical Surface("airinlet") = {24};
Physical Surface("airoutlet") = {32};
Physical Surface("air_top") = {20};
Physical Surface("solid_wall") = {50, 42, 46};
Physical Volume("solid") = {2};
Physical Volume("air") = {1};
jaydeep is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fluent Adjoint Solver? ex10148 FLUENT 16 September 28, 2018 08:11
thobois class engineTopoChangerMesh error Peter_600 OpenFOAM 4 August 2, 2014 09:52
Divergence problem Smaras FLUENT 13 February 21, 2013 05:03
3d vof Smaras FLUENT 2 February 19, 2013 06:58
why the solver reject it? Anyone with experience? bearcat CFX 6 April 28, 2008 14:08


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:29.