|
[Sponsors] |
January 29, 2017, 16:18 |
Time step size sensitivity of piso algorithm
|
#1 |
New Member
soichiro
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 11 |
Hello, for a simple circular cylinder case with Re=64k I have completely different vortex shedding frequency and force history using deltaT=4e-6s and deltaT=4e-7s. Both time steps are several magnitudes lower than shedding period, the larger time step actually compares better with experimental result.
I'm using 2nd order backward time scheme, I also tried Crank Nicolson and got another two different results, I don't know the segregated approach of the PISO algorithm is the cause, and I also tried adding an extra outer loop(PIMPLE algorithm) and the result is the same as the PISO. Please help, thanks! |
|
February 1, 2017, 17:00 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bad Wörishofen
Posts: 2,711
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 52 |
Hey,
I have no idea at the moment but maybe (really maybe) it is related to that one: Wrong treatment of time derivatives in matrices (Jasak Presentation)
__________________
Keep foaming, Tobias Holzmann |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Transient simulation not converging | skabilan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 14 | December 17, 2019 00:12 |
simpleFoam error - "Floating point exception" | mbcx4jc2 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 12 | August 4, 2015 03:20 |
Moving mesh | Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 122 | June 15, 2014 07:20 |
Micro Scale Pore, icoFoam | gooya_kabir | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | November 2, 2013 14:58 |
Upgraded from Karmic Koala 9.10 to Lucid Lynx10.04.3 | bookie56 | OpenFOAM Installation | 8 | August 13, 2011 05:03 |