CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM

Choice of Solver for calculation of water hammer effect under turbulent conditions

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 6, 2017, 16:28
Default Choice of Solver for calculation of water hammer effect under turbulent conditions
  #1
New Member
 
Oliver K
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 3
silencebreak is on a distinguished road
Hey everyone,

I got a case of a cave system which is omitted to a pressure tunnel. The upper cave is at free surface flow from where the water is going down through my pressure Tunnel to the lower cave system (which is not considered for my case). My plan is to observe the forces induced by the water hammer through closing the outlet. So I would like to use a moving mesh for varying the durations of closing.

So in general I would use interFoam for take the two phases of water and air into account but on the other hand i should use a compressible solver for the calculation of the water hammer effect. For that purpose I would use the SonicLiquidFoam.

Have anyone any idea of how to get both of them together and especially for a kind of beginner in OpenFOAM?

//Edit: I had another look at the solver today and thought about using the compressibleInterDyMFoam. Does anyone have experience with this solver and could validate whether it's a good or a bad choice?

Thanks everyone for helping!

Cheers
Oli
Attached Images
File Type: jpg System.jpg (13.4 KB, 43 views)

Last edited by silencebreak; July 7, 2017 at 11:13.
silencebreak is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 10, 2017, 12:51
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Taher Chegini
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 127
Rep Power: 7
Taataa is on a distinguished road
I have been working with compressibleInterFoam and it's a robust solver. The dynamic mesh version should be able to handle your case.
Taataa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 2, 2018, 19:10
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Anil Istanbullu
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 2
anil.istanbullu is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to anil.istanbullu
When it comes to waterhammer calculation by means of OF, it is highly recommended to go with sonicLiquidfoam to view oscillations about the pressure (min. and max.).

Trouble about this solver is that it is completely about a laminar instead of turbulent. Nowadays, i have been trying to combine turbulence issues with water hammer in order to observe turbulence during the case. According to my best understanding on that, turbulence shall be analyzed if user wants to have a complete analysis for water hammer. Otherwise, all the data the user have will be laminar flow inside pipeline and also pressure oscillations.

Regarding compressibleInterDyMFoam, to me it would be OK provided that your geometry would easily be drawn on openfoam itself since you can identify which block would move on request etc. If not, i specifically do not have an experience on that.

I will keep you posted here when the thing goes well.
anil.istanbullu is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wind turbine simulation Saturn CFX 57 February 6, 2018 06:09
Effect of inflow conditions on turbulent jet francesco_capuano Main CFD Forum 0 March 29, 2013 10:47
Turbulent Boundary Conditions cfd seeker FLUENT 2 June 24, 2011 03:28
Working directory via command line Luiz CFX 4 March 6, 2011 21:02
uptodate water distribution network fredius,magige,tanzanian,(e.a) Main CFD Forum 0 January 27, 2002 08:10


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:06.