|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Livia Adinolfi
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
Dear Foamers,
I am a new user of CFD and I am struggling to understand how to impose boundary conditions. For example I am not understanding why I have to specify simultaneously conditions on pressure and velocity. I was expecting that I have to impose one and have the other as output. Thanks ! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Uwe Pilz
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Posts: 744
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
In principle it is possible to have a flow both, pressure and velocity driven. I know such boundary conditions are rare, but physical possible. To specify the system you have to give all the physics.
If you want to have a velocity determined inflow or outflow, the pressure gradient is zero and this has to be set. It is best using this b.c if possible. Somewhere in the field you have to give a pressure reference point. If you want to drive your flow by a pressure difference, you have to set the pressure profile at the boundary. You have a free outflow or inflow then and have to set this: Gradient of velocity is zero.
__________________
Uwe Pilz -- Die der Hauptbewegung überlagerte Schwankungsbewegung ist in ihren Einzelheiten so hoffnungslos kompliziert, daß ihre theoretische Berechnung aussichtslos erscheint. (Hermann Schlichting, 1950) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
New Member
Livia Adinolfi
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
Thank you very much for the answer.
I have understood that I can consider a flow driven by a pressure difference at inlet and outlet and in this case I have to set the condition zeroGradient for the velocity. If I am imposing a velocity profile I have to consider zeroGradient for pressure. Is that correct ? If this is true, I still do not understand why. In fact, if I am imposing a velocity profile it is not true that the pressure gradient is zero. So this is what I am not understanding. Thanks ! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Uwe Pilz
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Posts: 744
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
> In fact, if I am imposing a velocity profile it is not true that the pressure gradient is zero.
Yes, that may be at your problem. In that case (that you know the pressure gradient for you case) simply set it.
__________________
Uwe Pilz -- Die der Hauptbewegung überlagerte Schwankungsbewegung ist in ihren Einzelheiten so hoffnungslos kompliziert, daß ihre theoretische Berechnung aussichtslos erscheint. (Hermann Schlichting, 1950) |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| sliding mesh problem in CFX | Saima | CFX | 46 | September 11, 2021 08:38 |
| Radiation in semi-transparent media with surface-to-surface model? | mpeppels | CFX | 11 | August 22, 2019 08:30 |
| Basic Nozzle-Expander Design | karmavatar | CFX | 20 | March 20, 2016 09:44 |
| GETVAR Error in Multiband Monte Carlo Radiation Simulation with Directional Source | silvan | CFX | 3 | June 16, 2014 10:49 |
| Question about heat transfer coefficient setting for CFX | Anna Tian | CFX | 1 | June 16, 2013 07:28 |