|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Kahlil Fredrick Cui
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Greetings!
I am simulating a very simple scenario of fluid entering through an inflow patch, overcoming a static boundary and exiting through an outflow. Very similar to the weir overflow in interfoam. My problem is that, instead of flowing in the x-direction, the flow goes up! I tried my boundary conditions on the blockMesh of the dambreak example, and it seemed to work fine, indicating that the problem is with my geometry. Here is my blockMesh Code:
convertToMeters 1;
vertices
(
(0 0 0)//0
(2 0 0)//1
(3 0 0)//2
(5 0 0)//3
(0 1 0)//4
(2 1 0)//5
(3 1 0)//6
(5 1 0)//7
(0 1.5 0)//8
(2 1.5 0)//9
(3 1.5 0)//10
(5 1.5 0)//11
(0 5 0)//12
(2 5 0)//13
(3 5 0)//14
(5 5 0)//15
(0 0 0.5)//16
(2 0 0.5)//17
(3 0 0.5)//18
(5 0 0.5)//19
(0 1 0.5)//20
(2 1 0.5)//21
(3 1 0.5)//22
(5 1 0.5)//23
(0 1.5 0.5)//24
(2 1.5 0.5)//25
(3 1.5 0.5)//26
(5 1.5 0.5)//27
(0 5 0.5)//28
(2 5 0.5)//29
(3 5 0.5)//30
(5 5 0.5)//31
);
blocks
(
hex (0 1 5 4 16 17 21 20) (30 30 15) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
hex (2 3 7 6 18 19 23 22) (30 30 15) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
hex (4 5 9 8 20 21 25 24) (30 15 15) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
hex (6 7 11 10 22 23 27 26) (30 15 15) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
hex (8 9 13 12 24 25 29 28) (30 60 15) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
hex (9 10 14 13 25 26 30 29) (30 60 15) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
hex (10 11 15 14 26 27 31 30) (30 60 15) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
);
edges
(
);
boundary
(
inlet
{
type patch;
faces
(
(0 16 20 4)
);
}
outlet
{
type patch;
faces
(
(7 23 19 3)
);
}
leftWall
{
type wall;
faces
(
(4 20 24 8)
(8 24 28 12)
);
}
rightWall
{
type wall;
faces
(
(11 27 23 7)
(15 31 27 11)
);
}
lowerWall
{
type wall;
faces
(
(0 1 17 16)
(1 5 21 17)
(9 10 26 25)
(10 6 22 26)
(6 2 18 22)
(2 3 19 18)
);
}
atmosphere
{
type patch;
faces
(
(12 28 29 13)
(14 13 29 30)
(14 30 31 15)
);
}
);
To further clarify my U: Code:
dimensions [0 1 -1 0 0 0 0];
internalField uniform (0 0 0);
boundaryField
{
inlet
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform (1 0 0);
}
outlet
{
type zeroGradient;
}
leftWall
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform (0 0 0);
}
rightWall
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform (0 0 0);
}
lowerWall
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform (0 0 0);
}
atmosphere
{
type pressureInletOutletVelocity;
value uniform (0 0 0);
}
defaultFaces
{
type empty;
}
}
Code:
dimensions [1 -1 -2 0 0 0 0];
internalField uniform 0;
boundaryField
{
inlet
{
type zeroGradient;
}
outlet
{
type totalPressure;
p0 uniform 0;
U U;
phi phi;
rho rho;
psi none;
gamma 1;
value uniform 0;
}
leftWall
{
type fixedFluxPressure;
value uniform 0;
}
rightWall
{
type fixedFluxPressure;
value uniform 0;
}
lowerWall
{
type fixedFluxPressure;
value uniform 0;
}
atmosphere
{
type totalPressure;
p0 uniform 0;
U U;
phi phi;
rho rho;
psi none;
gamma 1;
value uniform 0;
}
defaultFaces
{
type empty;
}
}
The simulation results are attached as an image. The error might be very simple. If you could just point me in the right direction, i'd be really grateful! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Marco A. Turcios
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 740
Rep Power: 29 ![]() |
Hi there,
Could you upload a stripped version of your case with all the BC's. I'm thinking perhaps your alpha field might have issues? If you suspect your geometry, does checkmesh work? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
New Member
Kahlil Fredrick Cui
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Hello!
Thanks for the response, but I already figured out the error. I should've updated this question then. I apologize. I actually found out that one of my floor faces was undefined. Weird thing was it didn't turn up during checkMesh. When I re-created the whole mesh, I found out I neglected one face. I also didn't expect the fluid to behave that way as a reaction to a missing face. Hope my error becomes a lesson for someone else. |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| dambreak, inflow bc, outflow bc |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Flow Direction: normal to boundary!!! | Atit | CFX | 1 | August 2, 2015 14:42 |
| [snappyHexMesh] jagged, ragged edges... | ziemowitzima | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 138 | July 24, 2012 00:41 |
| Moving mesh in Fluent | fivos | FLUENT | 0 | April 2, 2010 10:45 |
| [Commercial meshers] Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues | michele | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | July 15, 2005 05:15 |
| moving cylinder | blur boy | Main CFD Forum | 4 | October 12, 2001 06:32 |