CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM

Standard K-epsilon turbulence model with y~+1

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 10, 2019, 13:12
Default Standard K-epsilon turbulence model with y~+1
Senior Member
Evren Linda's Avatar
Evren Linda
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 115
Rep Power: 4
Evren Linda is on a distinguished road
I have a 2D mesh with y^+ = 1 of a computational domain around a cylinder with [inlet, outlet, top, bottom, cylinder].
I want to start two simulations: using the k-\omega SST and the standard k-\varepsilon turbulence models without changing the mesh.

As far as I know, for the k-\omega SST, the mesh is ok because y+ = 1. But for the k-\varepsilon model, it requires wall functions.

Can I use a mesh that has y+ = 1 with the standard k-\varepsilon model? if Yes which wall functions should I use at the wall (cylinder) for k (turbulent kinetic energy), and \varepsilon (turbulent dissipation)?
Evren Linda is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 15, 2019, 18:19
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 3
CFD_10 is on a distinguished road
The standard k-epsilon turbulence model cannot be used with Low-Re formulation. However you can use a Low-Re implementation, LaunderSharmaKE (it uses damping functions)
CFD_10 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 26, 2019, 01:13
Senior Member
sivakumar selvaraju
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: India
Posts: 205
Rep Power: 14
sivakumar is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to sivakumar
Hi Linda,
I dont know still you are looking for help regarding your Y+ and BCs.

It seems that you are clear about the wall function approach and resolving the boundary layers.

In your case, you are suppose to use Low Re k-Epsilon models.
for low Re k-Epsilon I have posted BCs long back (2013). I hope still you can use it (Please check it),

The boundary conditions are as follows (I used it for OF-2.1.1 Version),

Low Re model:

turbulence model : LaunderSharmaKE

nut ----> fixedValue (0)
k -----> fixedValue (1e-12)
epsilon -----> fixedValue (1e-8) it can be zeroGradient as well
nuTilda -----> fixedValue (0)

for high Re model:

nut ----> nutkWallFunction value (0)
k -------> kqRWallFunction value uniform (*******)
epsilon ----> epsilonWallFunction value uniform (*******)
nuTilda -----> zeroGradient

I hope it will be useful.

If there is any issue, please post it here,

sivakumar is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Antti Hellsten model: New Advanced kω Turbulence Model purnp2 OpenFOAM Programming & Development 0 May 9, 2019 19:16
Turbulence model choice dave13 CFX 3 December 22, 2015 07:12
Overflow Error in Multiphase Modelling with Two Continuous Fluids ashtonJ CFX 6 August 11, 2014 14:32
Wrong calculation of nut in the kOmegaSST turbulence model FelixL OpenFOAM Bugs 27 March 27, 2012 09:02
how modify standard turbulence model Angmar CFX 4 September 29, 2010 18:48

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:38.