Can the set up files created for openfoam v7.0 (from .org) can be used for openfoam 1

er_ijaz · January 10, 2020, 02:33

I noticed that openfoam software is provided by two different organisations
1. ESI group
2. OpenFOAM foundation.
My doubt is if the cases are set based on the version provided by openfoam foundation can be used for ESI group.

fresty · January 10, 2020, 04:42

Pardon my candidness but your question is depicting lack of effort and laziness... natural counter-questions would be: Firstly, do you have ESI development operational on your system? If yes, have you given it a shot? Did you run into issues with interchangeability? Why not post those (if any) issues?
On a slightly charitable note, the developments are 'largely' interchangeable in operation apart from few/rare syntactical differences but obviously have differences in development (additional solvers, discretization algorithms, etc.); both of which could generally be debugged/troubleshooted via output error messages.

er_ijaz · July 3, 2020, 09:33

Dear fresty,

Thanks for your reply. It is not because of laziness I tried what you said. I run cases now both version and check the results.
Previously I was using openfoam 4.0, a friend suggested ESI version is better for heat transfer analyses. So I just want to know others opnion also in case of shifting.
Also in recent times I noticed the same cases while running ESI version was good while resulted in error in foundation version.

Especially when I consider the effect of gravity in bouyant(boussinesq)simplefoam.

January 10, 2020, 02:33	Can the set up files created for openfoam v7.0 (from .org) can be used for openfoam 1	#1
er_ijaz Member ijaz fazil Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Singapore Posts: 73 Rep Power: 13	I noticed that openfoam software is provided by two different organisations 1. ESI group 2. OpenFOAM foundation. My doubt is if the cases are set based on the version provided by openfoam foundation can be used for ESI group.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Linux was created in GAMBIT mesh files I have.	jlaclee	FLUENT	0	July 11, 2012 07:23
OpenFOAM 1.7.1 installation problem on OpenSUSE 11.3	flakid	OpenFOAM Installation	16	December 28, 2010 08:48
Regarding FoamX running Kindly help out	hariya03	OpenFOAM Pre-Processing	0	April 18, 2008 04:26
case files created by Setupgrid	Federico Salimbeni	FLUENT	0	June 21, 2002 05:54
CFX4.3 -build analysis form	Chie Min	CFX	5	July 12, 2001 23:19

January 10, 2020, 04:42		#2
fresty Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: UK Posts: 213 Rep Power: 12	Pardon my candidness but your question is depicting lack of effort and laziness... natural counter-questions would be: Firstly, do you have ESI development operational on your system? If yes, have you given it a shot? Did you run into issues with interchangeability? Why not post those (if any) issues? On a slightly charitable note, the developments are 'largely' interchangeable in operation apart from few/rare syntactical differences but obviously have differences in development (additional solvers, discretization algorithms, etc.); both of which could generally be debugged/troubleshooted via output error messages.

July 3, 2020, 09:33		#3
er_ijaz Member ijaz fazil Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Singapore Posts: 73 Rep Power: 13	Dear fresty, Thanks for your reply. It is not because of laziness I tried what you said. I run cases now both version and check the results. Previously I was using openfoam 4.0, a friend suggested ESI version is better for heat transfer analyses. So I just want to know others opnion also in case of shifting. Also in recent times I noticed the same cases while running ESI version was good while resulted in error in foundation version. Especially when I consider the effect of gravity in bouyant(boussinesq)simplefoam.