CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM

Another Benchmark

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 11, 2008, 15:17
Default Hi Foamers ! I ran two benc
New Member
Andras Horvath
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 10
andras is on a distinguished road
Hi Foamers !

I ran two benchmarks on recent AMD and Intel CPUs and got some interesting results I wanted to share.

Case 1 (small, 351000 cells, 1000 Iterations):
Solver: twoPhaseEulerFoam

Case 2 (medium, 830000 cells, 400 Iterations):
Solver: turbFoam

Both cases were decomposed with the hierachical algorithm. Depending on the decomposition sequence (xyz, yxz, etc.) the calculation times differed only by a few percent and the differences were assumed to be negligible.

The following histograms show the absolute calculation times (smaller means better) for single process, 2x, 4x and 8x parallelized cases. Due to significant overhead and a generally small cell number the small test case was only run 2x parallel. The white markers indicate ideal times for parallel simulation runs.

All machines are equipped with 667 MHz DDR2 RAM. 8x parallel runs were performed on dual quad-core boards.

It's pretty interesting to see that rather cheap "Desktop" CPUs like the AMD Phenom 9500 can compete with high end server CPUs like the Intel Xeon E Series (that costs approx. 5 times more than the AMD Phenom) when running a single process.

The pricier Xeons parallelize much better than the low cost AMDs but still anything beyond two processes seams to be a waste of ressources.

andras is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 9, 2008, 14:02
Default Hi Andras, very nice perfor
sradl's Avatar
Stefan Radl
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Graz, Austria
Posts: 82
Rep Power: 11
sradl is on a distinguished road
Hi Andras,

very nice performance comparison. However, do you have also some experience with Intel's Core 2 Extreme Processors (similar to Xeon Processor) on desktop machines?

Also, it is fascinating why the nominally much slower AMD Phenom numbers out the Xeon 3 GHz machine. Do you have any explanation for this?
sradl is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 10, 2008, 08:35
Default Hi Stefan, The Xeon Machine
New Member
Andras Horvath
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 10
andras is on a distinguished road
Hi Stefan,

The Xeon Machines seem to have problems with the memory bandwidth. As you can see the Phenom's Hypertransport also gets 'saturated' when running more then two cores. There is no more speedup. I have also benchmarked an Intel Q6600 (QuadCore) which behaves better in parallel.

Here are the times (in seconds) for the Q6600 running the 'Medium' Case (830k Cells, turbFoam):

RAM: 667 MHz
1x ... 9859s (f=1.00)
2x ... 6398s (f=0.65)
4x ... 5624s (f=0.57)

As you can see from the figures the Intel Q6600 utilises multiple cores better than the AMD Phenom. For 800MHz RAM you get these values for the Q6600:

RAM: 800 MHz
1x ... 9503s (f=1.00)
2x ... 5958s (f=0.63)
4x ... 5031s (f=0.53)

To cut it short: The AMD Phenom is 10 to 15% faster than the Intel Q6600 for single core tasks but parallelises pretty badly.

I suppose the cheap AMD Phenom beats the high priced Xeons in floating point performance for certain operations... but this is just a guess...

A well designed mainboard will give you roughly 10 to 15% in performance boost. The same goes for faster RAM which is incredibly cheap at the moment.

andras is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MHD Benchmark Mukhopadhyay Main CFD Forum 4 August 29, 2011 21:37
Benchmark Ford Prefect Main CFD Forum 6 July 3, 2006 10:29
benchmark ernie FLUENT 0 July 9, 2005 02:17
LES benchmark kat Main CFD Forum 2 February 24, 2004 13:21
new P4 vs. AMD and ifc vs. g77 benchmark George Bergantz Main CFD Forum 3 July 9, 2002 03:04

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:13.